* Linux Kernel Commit 025cee7f8fef02af09b03c8e1cd9843cb32adf9b
@ 2013-02-28 22:11 John L. Males
2013-02-28 22:18 ` Dave Hansen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: John L. Males @ 2013-02-28 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Hansen; +Cc: linux-kernel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dave,
With respect to Linux Kernel Commit
025cee7f8fef02af09b03c8e1cd9843cb32adf9b Change Log:
<http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/ChangeLog-3.4.34>
comment "It has probably been the cause of a number of subtle
bugs over the years, although the conditions to excite them
would have been hard to trigger."
Would the Linux Kernel under "unique" Virtual Memory Subsystem
stress excite some of these "subtle bugs" in Linux Kernels
prior to this change set for Commit
025cee7f8fef02af09b03c8e1cd9843cb32adf9b? I am not asking for
you to identify the subtle bugs. It is obvious it would be
difficult to determine from reported and unreported cases such
bugs. Just your sense or first hand knowledge if a Linux Kernel
under "unique" stress including Virtual Memory Subsystem stress
would be a key element of?
I am one of those who seems to often cause system kernels of
any OS stress due to my very high power user use of Operating
Systems and hence why my question.
Regards,
John L. Males
Toronto, Ontario
Canada
28 February 2013 17:11
<mailto:jlmales@gmail.com>
==============================================================
2013-02-28 16:57:24.110757989-0500-EST
28 Feb 16:57:24 ntpdate[27847]: ntpdate 4.2.6p2@1.2194-o Sun
Oct 17 13:35:14 UTC 2010 (1)
28 Feb 16:58:59 ntpdate[27852]: step time server 132.246.11.228
offset -0.000138 sec
Linux 3.4.24-kernel.org-jlm-010-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Dec 23
10:06:41 EST 2012
Modified Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.3 (squeeze)
(Evaluating alternatives to Debian)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlEv1h8ACgkQ+V/XUtB6aBDSzQCgiu+hskZzz2bMfLG5u+Ao9YzJ
hwIAn1IY5jnq0sJjIe0nxFnA+LKrGtAh
=1KDN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Linux Kernel Commit 025cee7f8fef02af09b03c8e1cd9843cb32adf9b
2013-02-28 22:11 Linux Kernel Commit 025cee7f8fef02af09b03c8e1cd9843cb32adf9b John L. Males
@ 2013-02-28 22:18 ` Dave Hansen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2013-02-28 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jlmales; +Cc: linux-kernel
On 02/28/2013 02:11 PM, John L. Males wrote:
> Would the Linux Kernel under "unique" Virtual Memory Subsystem
> stress excite some of these "subtle bugs" in Linux Kernels
> prior to this change set for Commit
> 025cee7f8fef02af09b03c8e1cd9843cb32adf9b?
I don't think stress would really do it.
It also, as far as I know, only applies to 32-bit NUMA kernels where
CONFIG_NUMA was turned on _and_ where the machine actually was NUMA.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-28 22:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-28 22:11 Linux Kernel Commit 025cee7f8fef02af09b03c8e1cd9843cb32adf9b John L. Males
2013-02-28 22:18 ` Dave Hansen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox