From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751873Ab3CAEmF (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:42:05 -0500 Received: from alvesta.synopsys.com ([198.182.60.77]:48461 "EHLO alvesta.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750863Ab3CAEmD (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:42:03 -0500 Message-ID: <51303173.5060405@synopsys.com> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 10:11:23 +0530 From: Vineet Gupta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel To: Linus Torvalds CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Arnd Bergmann" , Thomas Gleixner , "Gilad Ben-Yossef" , Helge Deller , "Mischa Jonker" Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arch/arc for v3.9-rc1 References: <51271703.8050107@synopsys.com> In-Reply-To: <51271703.8050107@synopsys.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.12.197.217] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 22 February 2013 12:28 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote: > Hi Linus, > > I would like to introduce the Linux port to ARC Processors (from Synopsys) for > 3.9-rc1. The patch-set has been discussed on the public lists since Nov and has > received a fair bit of review, specially from Arnd, tglx, Al and other subsystem > maintainers for DeviceTree, kgdb ..... > > The arch bits are in arch/arc, some asm-generic changes (acked by Arnd), a minor > change to PARISC (acked by Helge). > > The series is a touch bigger for a new port for 2 main reasons: > 1. It enables a basic kernel in first sub-series and adds ptrace/kgdb/.. later > 2. Some of the fallout of review (DeviceTree support, multi-platform-image > support) were added on top of orig series, primarily to record the revision history. > > Please consider pulling. > > Thanks, > Vineet Hi Linus, Did you get a chance to look at the patch series and is there anything in particular which could be gating the merge. Thanks, Vineet