Re: [PATCH] mfd: palmas: provide irq flags through DT/platform data

[Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>]

On 02/03/13 11:35, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:34:40PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>
>> Is Palmas a family of chips rather than a single chip then? That
>> implies that the DT would need two compatible values, e.g.:
> Yes.
>
>> compatible = "ti,12345", "ti,palmas";
>> ... where "12345" is the actual chip name.
>> ... rather than just the following which IIRC was in the example in
>> the DT binding document in another patch series:
>> compatible = "ti,palmas";
> Indeed, and in fact this has already been done for the I2C device ID
> table.  We should have the same list of devices in the OF IDs.
Currently all members of the palmas family I know about (from memory).

For palmas :-
twl6035, twl6037, tps65913, tps65914

For palmas-charger :-
twl6036, tps80036

All with varying IP blocks or hardware configuration.

Mainly this is due to misunderstanding I had of DT definitions when I
originally read docs, when driver project commenced. I will work with
Ian, Laxman, Keerthy and get these updated.

Should these also flow down into the various drivers for the IP blocks? eg.

compatible = "ti,twl6035-regulator", "ti,palmas-regulator";

Graeme