From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751696Ab3CBXpb (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Mar 2013 18:45:31 -0500 Received: from smtp-02.mandic.com.br ([200.225.81.133]:52753 "EHLO smtp-02.mandic.com.br" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750970Ab3CBXpa (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Mar 2013 18:45:30 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 398 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 18:45:29 EST Message-ID: <51328D83.9030105@cesarb.net> Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 20:38:43 -0300 From: Cesar Eduardo Barros User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130219 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Perches CC: Paul Bolle , Andrew Morton , LKML , Simtec Linux Team , Ben Dooks Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] MAINTAINERS: Update SIMTEC file patterns, remove Vincent Sanders References: <1362166088.2116.10.camel@joe-AO722> <1362168132.2116.17.camel@joe-AO722> <1362169225.20156.6.camel@x61.thuisdomein> <1362170264.2116.24.camel@joe-AO722> In-Reply-To: <1362170264.2116.24.camel@joe-AO722> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em 01-03-2013 17:37, Joe Perches escreveu: > On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 21:20 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: >> On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 12:02 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: >>> commit 85fd6d6 ("ARM: S3C2410: move mach-s3c2410/* into mach-s3c24xx/") >>> moved the files, update the F: patterns. >> >> The BAST MAINTAINER entry has come up a few times already. I commented >> on the last time that happened in https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/24/96 . >> Nothing has changed. I suggest to remove this entry entirely. > > Seems sensible to me. Ben? > > I'm a bit surprised that all of Cesar Eduardo Barros' patches > to MAINTAINERS weren't applied. I thought they were. It > seems that only some of them are in. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/23/439 > > Cesar? Can you please resend whatever scraps weren't applied > and make sure you cc Andrew Morton? I just checked on my local tree, and it is only the BAST one. For some reason, Andrew Morton did not add that one to his tree (probably because there was discussion about removing the whole block instead of fixing it, so he prefered to take the uncontroversial ones only). The ones which were not in Andrew's tree all went in via other trees. It might be best for me to make a new series instead. My checkmaintainers.py already gives me 15 lines of output, and that is on top of what I have pending (BAST and part 2 of the uapi mess) rebased over the Linus tree. On the Linus tree, it gives me 42 lines of output. -- Cesar Eduardo Barros cesarb@cesarb.net cesar.barros@gmail.com