From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753270Ab3CCLtv (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Mar 2013 06:49:51 -0500 Received: from mms3.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.19]:2795 "EHLO mms3.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753011Ab3CCLtu (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Mar 2013 06:49:50 -0500 X-Server-Uuid: B86B6450-0931-4310-942E-F00ED04CA7AF Message-ID: <513338D5.4010302@broadcom.com> Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:49:41 +0100 From: "Arend van Spriel" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111103 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com cc: webmaster@kernel.org, "Konstantin Ryabitsev" , LKML , "Linus Torvalds" Subject: Re: [git.k.o] gitweb->cgit: Re-add Git snapshot tarball feature References: In-Reply-To: X-WSS-ID: 7D2DE8F83P46063236-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/03/13 12:34, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, > > unfortunately, the Git snapshot tarball feature was dropped when > switching from gitweb->cgit interface. Just curious. I am looking at gitweb and cgit for our internal repositories and still deciding so I would like to know what "your" main motivation was to move kernel.org over to cgit. Gr. AvS