From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty/serial: Fix uninitialized variable warning
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:41:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51346C33.6080504@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362364613.3221.144.camel@thor.lan>
On 03/04/2013 03:36 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 09:35 +0800, Grant Likely wrote:
>> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.c: In function 'serial_unlink_irq_chain':
>> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.c:1676:19: warning: 'i' may be used uninitialized in this function
>>
>> There isn't an actual bug here since the function tests the condition
>> that would cause i to be uninitialized before dereferencing i. However,
>> at least some versions of GCC complain as shown above. (in my case,
>> powerpc gcc 2.5.2). Initializing i to NULL makes it clear to GCC and the
>> casual code reviewer that i will not be dereferenced to a random
>> address.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>> ---
>> Greg, some may argue that this is a tool problem, not a kernel problem,
>> but it is useful to me. If anyone objects I'm not going to spend any
>> time championing for this patch.
>>
>> g.
>>
>> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.c
>> index 0efc815..cbbedcf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.c
>> @@ -1673,7 +1673,7 @@ static int serial_link_irq_chain(struct uart_8250_port *up)
>>
>> static void serial_unlink_irq_chain(struct uart_8250_port *up)
>> {
>> - struct irq_info *i;
>> + struct irq_info *i = NULL;
>
> struct irq_info *uninitialized_var(i);
>
> For gcc, the uninitialized_var() #define is in
> include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
As far as I remember, we decided not to use that macro any more after a
bug stemming out of its use.
And Grant uses a very old toolchain as we can see in the commit log. I'm
not sure whether it's worth to hide a potential bug in the future by
this patch.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-04 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-04 1:35 [PATCH] tty/serial: Fix uninitialized variable warning Grant Likely
2013-03-04 2:36 ` Peter Hurley
2013-03-04 9:41 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2013-03-15 20:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-03-15 21:24 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51346C33.6080504@suse.cz \
--to=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox