From: Rhyland Klein <rklein@nvidia.com>
To: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 2/3] power: power_supply: Add core support for supplied_nodes
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 12:32:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5134DAB3.5000604@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130302224832.GA16720@lizard.sbx05280.losalca.wayport.net>
On 3/2/2013 5:48 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 02:48:03PM -0500, Rhyland Klein wrote:
> [...]
>> Anton, David, would you be adverse to the changing of supplied_to
>> from being a
>> list of batteries stored in a charger to being a list of chargers
>> stored in batteries?
> I wonder if we can support both ways?..
>
> Thanks,
> Anton
Well, the interesting factor becomes either we end up with 2 arrays
(supplied_to, supplied_from) or we make 1 array (horray, save space!)
but need to then either have a flag or use the power_supply type to
know how to interpret the single array (as supplied_to or supplied_from).
Adding in the second array and adds a char ** and an int, which doesn't seem
like as much overhead as trying to figure out how to interpret the
single array
so I am inclined to stick with 2 arrays.
-rhyland
--
nvpublic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-04 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-21 23:11 [RFC v2 0/3] Add DT Binding for Power-Supply power-supply property Rhyland Klein
2013-02-21 23:11 ` [RFC v2 1/3] power_supply: Define Binding for supplied-nodes Rhyland Klein
2013-02-22 19:46 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-22 22:05 ` Rhyland Klein
2013-02-21 23:11 ` [RFC v2 2/3] power: power_supply: Add core support for supplied_nodes Rhyland Klein
2013-02-22 19:49 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-22 21:55 ` Rhyland Klein
2013-02-22 23:01 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-28 19:54 ` Rhyland Klein
2013-02-22 20:09 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-22 21:58 ` Rhyland Klein
2013-02-28 19:48 ` Rhyland Klein
2013-03-02 22:48 ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-03-04 17:32 ` Rhyland Klein [this message]
2013-03-04 17:47 ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-02-21 23:11 ` [RFC v2 3/3] power: power_supply: add support for getting supplied-nodes from dt Rhyland Klein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5134DAB3.5000604@nvidia.com \
--to=rklein@nvidia.com \
--cc=anton@enomsg.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox