From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
rostedt@goodmis.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: introduce lock_acquire_exclusive/shared helper macros
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 23:19:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51360CFC.7040807@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362449845-7492-2-git-send-email-walken@google.com>
On 05/03/13 10:17, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> In lockdep.h, the spinlock/mutex/rwsem/rwlock/lock_map acquire macros
> have different definitions based on the value of CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING.
> We have separate ifdefs for each of these definitions, which seems
> redundant.
>
> Introduce lock_acquire_{exclusive,shared,shared_recursive} helpers
> which will have different definitions based on CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING.
> Then all other helper macros can be defined based on the above ones,
> which reduces the amount of ifdefined code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
>
> ---
> include/linux/lockdep.h | 92 +++++++++++++------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
> index f1e877b79ed8..cfc2f119779a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ extern void lockdep_trace_alloc(gfp_t mask);
>
> #define lockdep_recursing(tsk) ((tsk)->lockdep_recursion)
>
> -#else /* !LOCKDEP */
> +#else /* !CONFIG_LOCKDEP */
>
> static inline void lockdep_off(void)
> {
> @@ -479,82 +479,36 @@ static inline void print_irqtrace_events(struct task_struct *curr)
> * on the per lock-class debug mode:
> */
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> -# ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> -# define spin_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 2, NULL, i)
> -# define spin_acquire_nest(l, s, t, n, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 2, n, i)
> -# else
> -# define spin_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 1, NULL, i)
> -# define spin_acquire_nest(l, s, t, n, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 1, NULL, i)
> -# endif
> -# define spin_release(l, n, i) lock_release(l, n, i)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> + #define lock_acquire_exclusive(l, s, t, n, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 2, n, i)
> + #define lock_acquire_shared(l, s, t, n, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 1, 2, n, i)
> + #define lock_acquire_shared_recursive(l, s, t, n, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 2, 2, n, i)
Hi, Michel
I don't like the name lock_acquire_shared_recursive().
(I mean the name is wrong, ......)
In the lockdep design, lock_acquire(l, s, t, 2, 2, n, i) is used for
read-preference locks(rwlock) and all types of RCU. not for "recursive"
read-preference implies "recursive".
But the name lock_acquire_shared_recursive() don't tell us it is
read-preference.
Example if we do have a lock which is write-preference but allow read_lock recursive,
it will be still deadlock in this way, "recursive" does not help:
cpu0: spin_lock(a); recursiveable_read_lock(b)
cpu1: recursiveable_read_lock(b); spin_lock(a);
cpu2: write_lock(b);
I also noticed the lockdep annotations problem of lglock. and patch2 is good,
so for patch2: Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Thanks,
Lai
> #else
> -# define spin_acquire(l, s, t, i) do { } while (0)
> -# define spin_release(l, n, i) do { } while (0)
> + #define lock_acquire_exclusive(l, s, t, n, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 1, n, i)
> + #define lock_acquire_shared(l, s, t, n, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 1, 1, n, i)
> + #define lock_acquire_shared_recursive(l, s, t, n, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 2, 1, n, i)
> #endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> -# ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> -# define rwlock_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 2, NULL, i)
> -# define rwlock_acquire_read(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 2, 2, NULL, i)
> -# else
> -# define rwlock_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 1, NULL, i)
> -# define rwlock_acquire_read(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 2, 1, NULL, i)
> -# endif
> -# define rwlock_release(l, n, i) lock_release(l, n, i)
> -#else
> -# define rwlock_acquire(l, s, t, i) do { } while (0)
> -# define rwlock_acquire_read(l, s, t, i) do { } while (0)
> -# define rwlock_release(l, n, i) do { } while (0)
> -#endif
> +#define spin_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire_exclusive(l, s, t, NULL, i)
> +#define spin_acquire_nest(l, s, t, n, i) lock_acquire_exclusive(l, s, t, n, i)
> +#define spin_release(l, n, i) lock_release(l, n, i)
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> -# ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> -# define mutex_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 2, NULL, i)
> -# define mutex_acquire_nest(l, s, t, n, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 2, n, i)
> -# else
> -# define mutex_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 1, NULL, i)
> -# define mutex_acquire_nest(l, s, t, n, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 1, n, i)
> -# endif
> -# define mutex_release(l, n, i) lock_release(l, n, i)
> -#else
> -# define mutex_acquire(l, s, t, i) do { } while (0)
> -# define mutex_acquire_nest(l, s, t, n, i) do { } while (0)
> -# define mutex_release(l, n, i) do { } while (0)
> -#endif
> +#define rwlock_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire_exclusive(l, s, t, NULL, i)
> +#define rwlock_acquire_read(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire_shared_recursive(l, s, t, NULL, i)
> +#define rwlock_release(l, n, i) lock_release(l, n, i)
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> -# ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> -# define rwsem_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 2, NULL, i)
> -# define rwsem_acquire_nest(l, s, t, n, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 2, n, i)
> -# define rwsem_acquire_read(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 1, 2, NULL, i)
> -# else
> -# define rwsem_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 1, NULL, i)
> -# define rwsem_acquire_nest(l, s, t, n, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 1, n, i)
> -# define rwsem_acquire_read(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 1, 1, NULL, i)
> -# endif
> +#define mutex_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire_exclusive(l, s, t, NULL, i)
> +#define mutex_acquire_nest(l, s, t, n, i) lock_acquire_exclusive(l, s, t, n, i)
> +#define mutex_release(l, n, i) lock_release(l, n, i)
> +
> +#define rwsem_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire_exclusive(l, s, t, NULL, i)
> +#define rwsem_acquire_nest(l, s, t, n, i) lock_acquire_exclusive(l, s, t, n, i)
> +#define rwsem_acquire_read(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire_shared(l, s, t, NULL, i)
> # define rwsem_release(l, n, i) lock_release(l, n, i)
> -#else
> -# define rwsem_acquire(l, s, t, i) do { } while (0)
> -# define rwsem_acquire_nest(l, s, t, n, i) do { } while (0)
> -# define rwsem_acquire_read(l, s, t, i) do { } while (0)
> -# define rwsem_release(l, n, i) do { } while (0)
> -#endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> -# ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> -# define lock_map_acquire(l) lock_acquire(l, 0, 0, 0, 2, NULL, _THIS_IP_)
> -# define lock_map_acquire_read(l) lock_acquire(l, 0, 0, 2, 2, NULL, _THIS_IP_)
> -# else
> -# define lock_map_acquire(l) lock_acquire(l, 0, 0, 0, 1, NULL, _THIS_IP_)
> -# define lock_map_acquire_read(l) lock_acquire(l, 0, 0, 2, 1, NULL, _THIS_IP_)
> -# endif
> +#define lock_map_acquire(l) lock_acquire_exclusive(l, 0, 0, NULL, _THIS_IP_)
> +#define lock_map_acquire_read(l) lock_acquire_shared_recursive(l, 0, 0, NULL, _THIS_IP_)
> # define lock_map_release(l) lock_release(l, 1, _THIS_IP_)
> -#else
> -# define lock_map_acquire(l) do { } while (0)
> -# define lock_map_acquire_read(l) do { } while (0)
> -# define lock_map_release(l) do { } while (0)
> -#endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> # define might_lock(lock) \
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-05 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-05 2:17 [PATCH 0/2] tighten lglock lockdep annotations Michel Lespinasse
2013-03-05 2:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: introduce lock_acquire_exclusive/shared helper macros Michel Lespinasse
2013-03-05 15:19 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2013-03-05 15:40 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-03-05 17:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-05 2:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] lglock: update lockdep annotations to report recursive local locks Michel Lespinasse
2013-03-05 17:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-05 18:24 ` Michel Lespinasse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51360CFC.7040807@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox