From: Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Srikar <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jiannan Ouyang <ouyang@cs.pitt.edu>,
"Andrew M. Theurer" <habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] kvm: Record the preemption status of vcpus using preempt notifiers
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 07:19:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51360D0D.5020609@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130304180206.31281.67229.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com>
On 3/4/2013 10:02 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Note that we mark as preempted only when vcpu's task state was
> Running during preemption.
>
> Thanks Jiannan, Avi for preemption notifier ideas. Thanks Gleb, PeterZ
> for their precious suggestions. Thanks Srikar for an idea on avoiding
> rcu lock while checking task state that improved overcommit numbers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index cad77fe..0b31e1c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu {
> bool dy_eligible;
> } spin_loop;
> #endif
> + bool preempted;
> struct kvm_vcpu_arch arch;
> };
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index adc68fe..83a804c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ int kvm_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm *kvm, unsigned id)
>
> kvm_vcpu_set_in_spin_loop(vcpu, false);
> kvm_vcpu_set_dy_eligible(vcpu, false);
> + vcpu->preempted = false;
>
> r = kvm_arch_vcpu_init(vcpu);
> if (r < 0)
> @@ -2902,6 +2903,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu *preempt_notifier_to_vcpu(struct preempt_notifier *pn)
> static void kvm_sched_in(struct preempt_notifier *pn, int cpu)
> {
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = preempt_notifier_to_vcpu(pn);
> + if (vcpu->preempted)
> + vcpu->preempted = false;
>
> kvm_arch_vcpu_load(vcpu, cpu);
> }
> @@ -2911,6 +2914,8 @@ static void kvm_sched_out(struct preempt_notifier *pn,
> {
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = preempt_notifier_to_vcpu(pn);
>
> + if (current->state == TASK_RUNNING)
> + vcpu->preempted = true;
> kvm_arch_vcpu_put(vcpu);
> }
>
>
> .
>
Reviewed-by: Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-05 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-04 18:01 [PATCH RFC 0/2] kvm: Better yield_to candidate using preemption notifiers Raghavendra K T
2013-03-04 18:02 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] kvm: Record the preemption status of vcpus using preempt notifiers Raghavendra K T
2013-03-05 15:19 ` Chegu Vinod [this message]
2013-03-07 9:19 ` Raghavendra K T
2013-03-04 18:02 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] kvm: Iterate over only vcpus that are preempted Raghavendra K T
2013-03-05 15:20 ` Chegu Vinod
2013-03-05 9:53 ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] kvm: Better yield_to candidate using preemption notifiers Andrew Jones
2013-03-05 12:24 ` Raghavendra K T
2013-03-05 12:40 ` Andrew Jones
2013-03-07 19:10 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-08 7:13 ` Raghavendra K T
2013-03-11 9:38 ` Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51360D0D.5020609@hp.com \
--to=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
--cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ouyang@cs.pitt.edu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox