From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932426AbcIALR6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:17:58 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:64307 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755196AbcIALRw (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:17:52 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Tomasz Figa , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Sylwester Nawrocki , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim , javier@osg.samsung.com, Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: dts: s3c2416: Use macros for pinctrl configuration Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 13:17:13 +0200 Message-ID: <5137342.oSWmFr9Y8D@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-34-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1472721715-2833-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <1608454.1ZuTJsprje@amdc1976> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:mExHWVKAYVFXNWJAJdAAPJ28srS0wdXjO0ECRezDNdqcbBiIol4 l4lxF/Ww70smYMSifNu4gEtNnl0fW+fDr/j19xat/K8NJiwHQ3KHsOvnjEOziIXn6E7DYXC 9g+EaqNITeiSp25eRm7tz75159EGZH3lqsUSWeuUwMLS5R1PoKd5Uoes0nqUGF4Ehg2BK4W QM0HSAoGBhzUS0qkxYH3w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:P4qpTg1GMOA=:0v2j0G70IPtUAKP60RYPs0 aGa2IMnJVlmf3lv4vV/Gj1HaTetJGbXI3riwpJJRJQXNZqrkfQQvw4pDqKH2Nuno4s7o/mxEe FvkrZPsGXp13uYveZ6VdIVhfcY9rrZXzGTJe6JNGgfKMfXl1MYCdI211AWnH5oZsJn+90UPJa YZECOxqdYoIcmyzA6vaEzuxRL6Gr+u0ZINkdA4ZbNHlky/i135swrOWmlxv10/Sf2dYlII6vD t4XGrLVu1xWnVs+XC5F+uVwiSzHoihU/kLb7pi4DkTwg23cVItiI/EEaZDmCyoFeQuJ2A6Wjq cIBppgPeaE63Mz/OtafjBRPq8w/jDY2eQChr0IEiaC/vP/WyekOuBaAyf9ymCQqwE9zsuYMTP DCpjceTdkjo3hjgQ5zygPrxu1gV1W7ME29cD+T5+5Sqqh5MbMbVSPSGpWgdVBae4fRKskaGTi EJpPtDQwAhg/LF6++cA8AAKNYDGaFQoMhqn1jwaafOsvKHmHD5MyEwGdEuPEaoBNvLvRqIBvs I+hOKD727oVmqEjALQbZRYbWmkNGkmmu2PvwssDHxTl8MmlZOakGLdAzl3mYo1hUxZJHtC7K9 ns+VDa70n/xx+p/8ORXB5/UKaUo5h0WzNb/n2gotckggMR4DNn0OgDw1pncGfb4kI9Pae4b3R 50o10KtP1HSCU4axhaW7k7Mx1+SqGH5we3zmNvhEI35CF4ljw6vfjQQyqWgehcmc2r/hnIs9j Vz/vHwgNABmWJMen Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, September 1, 2016 1:12:18 PM CEST Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > Shouldn't macros that are also used by s3c* be named as > > SAMSUNG_PIN_FUNC_2 etc. (s3c* SoCs are not Exynos)? > > Right, this is the inconsistency. The problem with "samsung" prefix is > that there is no guarantee it will be like that for newer SoCs. How > about one of: > 1. using the oldest prefix (S3C24XX in this case), > 2. duplicating them per SoC family (so S3C24XX, S3C64XX, EXYNOS). > ? I'd suggest living with the inconsistency and using EXYNOS as the prefix, as that is the most common one these days, even if the other ones predate it. Arnd