From: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@parallels.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] [SCSI] scsi_transport_sas: check for allocation failure
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:57:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <513A2678.5000803@interlog.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130308120215.GB18712@longonot.mountain>
On 13-03-08 07:02 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Static checkers complain that this allocation isn't checked. We
> should return zero if the allocation fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c
> index 1b68142..a022997 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c
> @@ -379,9 +379,12 @@ sas_tlr_supported(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> {
> const int vpd_len = 32;
> struct sas_end_device *rdev = sas_sdev_to_rdev(sdev);
> - char *buffer = kzalloc(vpd_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> + char *buffer;
> int ret = 0;
>
> + buffer = kzalloc(vpd_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!buffer)
> + goto out;
> if (scsi_get_vpd_page(sdev, 0x90, buffer, vpd_len))
> goto out;
>
For 32 bytes, why not use the stack?
unsigned int
sas_tlr_supported(struct scsi_device *sdev)
{
unsigned char buffer[32];
struct sas_end_device *rdev = sas_sdev_to_rdev(sdev);
int ret = 0;
if (scsi_get_vpd_page(sdev, 0x90, buffer, sizeof(buffer)))
goto out;
/*
* The VPD Protocol Specific Logical Unit page (0x90) for SAS
* has a 4 byte header and then one descriptor per device port.
* The TLR bit is at offset 8 on each port descriptor.
* We take the TLR value in the first descriptor.
*/
ret = buffer[4 + 8] & 0x01;
out:
rdev->tlr_supported = ret;
return ret;
}
Note the comment is changed.
Doug Gilbert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-08 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-08 12:02 [patch] [SCSI] scsi_transport_sas: check for allocation failure Dan Carpenter
2013-03-08 17:57 ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2013-03-08 19:58 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-03-08 22:50 ` James Bottomley
2013-03-08 23:25 ` Douglas Gilbert
2013-03-11 13:10 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-03-11 14:48 ` Douglas Gilbert
2013-03-11 15:10 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=513A2678.5000803@interlog.com \
--to=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox