Re: [PATCH 30/31] driver/base: implement subsys_virtual_register()

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-03-10T17:23:49Z

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 06:00:18PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 04:57:02AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> Hey, guys.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 01:04:25AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >> > > Sorry for the delay, I'm at a conference all this week, and haven't had
> >> > > much time to think about this.
> >> > >
> >> > > If Kay says this is ok for now, that's good enough for me.
> >> >
> >> > Yes, it looks fine to me. If we provide the unified handling of
> >> > classes and buses some day, this can probably go away, but until that
> >> > it looks fine and is straight forward to do it that way,
> >>
> >> How should this be routed? I can take it but Kay needs it too so
> >> workqueue tree probably isn't the best fit although I can set up a
> >> separate branch if needed.
> >
> > What patch set does Kay need it for? I have no objection for you to
> > take it through the workqueue tree:
>
> The dbus bus has the same issues and needs the devices put under
> virtual/ and not the devices/ root.

Yes, but I can keep Tejun's patch in my local queue for now, dbus is
going to not make 3.10, right?

thanks,

greg k-h