From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754092Ab3CKQVL (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:21:11 -0400 Received: from sema.semaphore.gr ([78.46.194.137]:37841 "EHLO sema.semaphore.gr" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753320Ab3CKQVJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:21:09 -0400 Message-ID: <513E0471.6@semaphore.gr> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:21:05 +0200 From: Stratos Karafotis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130219 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: Viresh Kumar , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 linux-next] cpufreq: conservative: Use an inline function to evaluate freq_target References: <51366C77.3080309@semaphore.gr> <51374F8D.9040300@semaphore.gr> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On 6 March 2013 22:15, Stratos Karafotis wrote: >> Use an inline function to evaluate freq_target to avoid duplicate code. >> >> Also, define a macro for the default frequency step. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis >> --- >> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------ >> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Hi Rafael, Could you please let me know if this patchset is going to be applied or not? Thank you in advance for your time, Stratos