From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755323Ab3COOxE (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:53:04 -0400 Received: from multi.imgtec.com ([194.200.65.239]:44987 "EHLO multi.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754703Ab3COOxB (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:53:01 -0400 Message-ID: <514335C9.5000501@imgtec.com> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:52:57 +0000 From: James Hogan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , , Alexander Viro CC: James Hogan Subject: Re: [PATCH resend v5] fs: imgdafs: Add IMG DAFS filesystem for metag References: <1362747737-27557-1-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com> In-Reply-To: <1362747737-27557-1-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [192.168.154.65] X-SEF-Processed: 7_3_0_01181__2013_03_15_14_52_58 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/03/13 13:02, James Hogan wrote: > Add the IMG Debug Adapter File System (DAFS) for metag, which uses > SWITCH operations to communicate with a file server on a host computer > via a JTAG debug adapter. > > Signed-off-by: James Hogan > Cc: Alexander Viro > --- > This is pretty much a resend of v4, but separated from the arch/metag > patchset. I didn't get any response beyond v1 so I excluded it from that > patchset. I'd like to get it included in v3.10. Ping. I'd like to get this accepted for v3.10, but haven't had a response to it since October. Do new file systems like this normally go through the official vfs tree or should I just take it through the metag tree? Cheers James