From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Northup <digitaleric@google.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: MMU: fast invalid all mmio sptes
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:52:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51481933.1050009@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130319073648.GT11223@redhat.com>
On 03/19/2013 03:36 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:15:36AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> On 03/19/2013 06:16 AM, Eric Northup wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Xiao Guangrong
>>> <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>> This patch tries to introduce a very simple and scale way to invalid all
>>>> mmio sptes - it need not walk any shadow pages and hold mmu-lock
>>>>
>>>> KVM maintains a global mmio invalid generation-number which is stored in
>>>> kvm->arch.mmio_invalid_gen and every mmio spte stores the current global
>>>> generation-number into his available bits when it is created
>>>>
>>>> When KVM need zap all mmio sptes, it just simply increase the global
>>>> generation-number. When guests do mmio access, KVM intercepts a MMIO #PF
>>>> then it walks the shadow page table and get the mmio spte. If the
>>>> generation-number on the spte does not equal the global generation-number,
>>>> it will go to the normal #PF handler to update the mmio spte
>>>>
>>>> Since 19 bits are used to store generation-number on mmio spte, the
>>>> generation-number can be round after 33554432 times. It is large enough
>>>> for nearly all most cases, but making the code be more strong, we zap all
>>>> shadow pages when the number is round
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +
>>>> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>>> arch/x86/kvm/mmutrace.h | 17 +++++++++++
>>>> arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 7 +++-
>>>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 4 ++
>>>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 6 +--
>>>> 6 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>>> index ef7f4a5..572398e 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>>> @@ -529,6 +529,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
>>>> unsigned int n_requested_mmu_pages;
>>>> unsigned int n_max_mmu_pages;
>>>> unsigned int indirect_shadow_pages;
>>>> + unsigned int mmio_invalid_gen;
>>>
>>> Could this get initialized to something close to the wrap-around
>>> value, so that the wrap-around case gets more real-world coverage?
>>
>> I am afraid we can not. We cache the current mmio_invalid_gen into mmio spte when
>> it is created no matter what the initiation value is.
>>
>> If you have a better way, please show me. ;)
>>
> The idea is to initialize mmio_invalid_gen to value close to MAX_GEN in
> order to exercise
Oh, got it, i understood it as "initialize mmio_invalid properly to _avoid_ more
wrap-around"... Sorry for my careless! :(
The idea can check the hardly-run code at runtime, i am fine with this.
Thank you, Eric and Gleb!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-19 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-15 15:26 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: MMU: fast invalid all mmio sptes Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-15 15:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] Revert "KVM: x86: Optimize mmio spte zapping when, creating/moving memslot" Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-16 2:07 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-03-18 7:36 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-15 15:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] Revert "KVM: MMU: Mark sp mmio cached when creating mmio spte" Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-15 15:28 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: MMU: retain more available bits available on mmio spte Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-15 15:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: MMU: store generation-number into " Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-18 11:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-18 12:42 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-18 12:48 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-20 18:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-15 15:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: MMU: fast invalid all mmio sptes Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-16 2:13 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-03-18 7:38 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-17 15:02 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-18 8:08 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-18 9:13 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-18 12:29 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-18 12:46 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-18 13:09 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-18 13:19 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-18 13:25 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-18 13:27 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-18 13:32 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-18 22:16 ` Eric Northup
2013-03-19 3:15 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-19 7:36 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-19 7:52 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2013-03-16 2:06 ` [PATCH 0/5] " Takuya Yoshikawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51481933.1050009@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=digitaleric@google.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox