From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
To: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hpet, allow user controlled mmap for user processes
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:21:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5148747C.9020803@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5148171D.10807@ladisch.de>
On 03/19/2013 03:43 AM, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> The CONFIG_HPET_MMAP Kconfig option exposes the memory map of the HPET
>> registers to userspace. The Kconfig help points out that in some cases this
>> can be a security risk as some systems may erroneously configure the map such
>> that additional data is exposed to userspace.
>>
>> This is a problem for distributions -- some users want the MMAP functionality
>> but it comes with a significant security risk. In an effort to mitigate this
>> risk, and due to the low number of users of the MMAP functionality, I've
>> introduced a kernel parameter, hpet_mmap_enable, that is required in order
>> to actually have the HPET MMAP exposed.
>>
>> [v2]: Clemens suggested modifying the Kconfig help text and making the
>> default setting configurable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
>
>> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
>> + hpet_mmap_enable [X86, HPET_MMAP] option to expose HPET MMAP to
>> + userspace. By default this is disabled.
>
> This now takes a value.
>
>> + int "Enable HPET MMAP access by default"
>> + range 0 1
>
> Shouldn't this be bool?
I'll fix those in v3.
>
>> + default 0
>
> This breaks backwards compatibility.
Does backwards compatibility matter for something like? I have no problem
setting it to 1 but I'm more curious from a general kernel point of view.
I'll change this in v3 as well.
P.
P.
>
>
> Regards,
> Clemens
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-19 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-15 20:00 [PATCH] hpet, allow user controlled mmap for user processes Prarit Bhargava
2013-03-16 9:54 ` Clemens Ladisch
2013-03-18 12:24 ` Prarit Bhargava
2013-03-19 7:43 ` Clemens Ladisch
2013-03-19 14:21 ` Prarit Bhargava [this message]
2013-03-19 14:51 ` Clemens Ladisch
2013-03-22 13:32 ` Prarit Bhargava
2013-08-29 6:01 ` Matt Wilson
2013-09-13 0:00 ` Prarit Bhargava
2013-09-29 20:28 ` [PATCH] hpet: " Clemens Ladisch
2013-03-19 14:49 ` [PATCH] hpet, " Prarit Bhargava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5148747C.9020803@redhat.com \
--to=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=clemens@ladisch.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox