From: Ilya Zykov <linux@izyk.ru>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] n_tty: Buffer work should not reschedule itself
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:27:38 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5148CA3A.7080804@izyk.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363703218-32333-4-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com>
On 19.03.2013 18:26, Peter Hurley wrote:
> Although the driver-side input path must update the available
> buffer space, it should not reschedule itself. If space is still
> available and the flip buffers are not empty, flush_to_ldisc()
> will loop again.
>
Sounds reasonable to me.
Thank you.
Ilya Zykov <linux@izyk.ru>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-19 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-06 13:38 [PATCH 0/7] n_tty fixes Peter Hurley
2013-03-06 13:38 ` [PATCH 1/7] n_tty: Fix unsafe driver-side signals Peter Hurley
2013-03-06 13:38 ` [PATCH 2/7] n_tty: Lock access to tty->pgrp for POSIX job control Peter Hurley
2013-03-06 13:38 ` [PATCH 3/7] tty: Fix checkpatch errors in tty_ldisc.h Peter Hurley
2013-03-06 13:38 ` [PATCH 4/7] n_tty: Encapsulate minimum_to_wake within N_TTY Peter Hurley
2013-03-18 23:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-03-19 13:57 ` Peter Hurley
2013-03-19 14:10 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-03-19 14:26 ` Peter Hurley
2013-03-19 14:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] n_tty: Untangle read completion variables Peter Hurley
2013-03-19 14:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] n_tty: Fix unsafe update of available buffer space Peter Hurley
2013-03-19 20:26 ` Ilya Zykov
2013-03-19 14:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] n_tty: Buffer work should not reschedule itself Peter Hurley
2013-03-19 20:27 ` Ilya Zykov [this message]
2013-06-15 11:28 ` [PATCH 0/4] [resend] n_tty fixes Peter Hurley
2013-06-15 11:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] n_tty: Encapsulate minimum_to_wake within N_TTY Peter Hurley
2013-06-15 11:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] n_tty: Untangle read completion variables Peter Hurley
2013-06-15 11:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] n_tty: Fix unsafe update of available buffer space Peter Hurley
2013-06-15 11:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] n_tty: Buffer work should not reschedule itself Peter Hurley
2013-06-17 19:58 ` [PATCH 0/4] [resend] n_tty fixes Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-03-06 13:38 ` [PATCH 5/7] n_tty: Untangle read completion variables Peter Hurley
2013-03-06 13:38 ` [PATCH 6/7] n_tty: Fix unsafe update of available buffer space Peter Hurley
2013-03-06 13:38 ` [PATCH 7/7] n_tty: Buffer work should not reschedule itself Peter Hurley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5148CA3A.7080804@izyk.ru \
--to=linux@izyk.ru \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox