From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: Don't enable PLLs during early boot
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:12:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5150777B.8030304@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130325110236.GP4977@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 03/25/2013 05:02 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 09:48:11AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> This assumption was made long ago. I know drivers are supposed to assume
>> that clocks are disabled when they're probed, but historically that
>> wasn't always the case, so if the audio drivers assumed that, and then
>> did clk_enable() as the first thing, they got a warning due to the
>> enabling an already enabled clock and/or later attempts to disable the
>> clocks wouldn't actually disable them.
>
> No. clocks have always been able to be enabled multiple times. You
> should only get a warning if you try and disable it more times than you
> enabled it, because that's a violation of the API.
That may have been the issue; the clock may have been on at boot, and
hence the driver attempted to disable it without ever enabling it
itself, and this triggered an error/warning.
Equally, it's plausible this issue is long gone; the audio clocks were
set up this way due to issues over 2 years ago when the audio code was
upstreamed. At that time, Tegra's clock code was using very little
standard infra-structure, whereas now it's been cleaned up to use the
common clock framework etc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-25 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-22 11:54 [PATCH] clk: tegra: Don't enable PLLs during early boot Peter De Schrijver
2013-03-22 15:48 ` Stephen Warren
2013-03-25 10:15 ` Peter De Schrijver
2013-03-25 11:14 ` Prashant Gaikwad
2013-03-25 17:32 ` Stephen Warren
2013-03-25 11:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-25 16:12 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-22 12:02 Peter De Schrijver
2013-03-22 12:09 ` Peter De Schrijver
2013-03-22 12:06 Peter De Schrijver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5150777B.8030304@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
--cc=pgaikwad@nvidia.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox