From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753519Ab3CZRe7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:34:59 -0400 Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:10675 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753131Ab3CZRe6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:34:58 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,913,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="32623548" Message-ID: <5151DC41.7090307@codeaurora.org> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:34:57 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnd Bergmann CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Stephen Warren , Kukjin Kim , Russell King , Srinidhi Kasagar , Tony Lindgren , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Sascha Hauer , Barry Song , Olof Johansson Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries References: <1362007694-3419-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <512E9A39.3070207@wwwdotorg.org> <51354E35.1080804@codeaurora.org> <201303052234.32723.arnd@arndb.de> <5144C8DC.9010104@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <5144C8DC.9010104@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/16/13 12:32, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 3/5/2013 2:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Tuesday 05 March 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> On 02/27/13 15:43, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>> Seems simple enough it doesn't really need many, but for Tegra, >>>> Acked-by: Stephen Warren >>>> >>>> Which kernel is this going into? It's possible Tegra will get converted >>>> to multi-platform in 3.10, which might move that main ARCH_TEGRA block >>>> from arch/arm/Kconfig into arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig, although I >>>> suppose it doesn't have to move it. I think some/all(?) other >>>> multi-platform conversions have moved their main Kconfig option like >>>> that though. >>> Thanks. I'm hoping that Arnd/Olof can pick this up. I'm not sure which >>> version it will go into. >>> >> Hmm, it certainly looks useful to me. I think it should go into the next >> cleanup branch as a base, so others can build on top of it. We will >> also need it for the Exynos multiplatform patches that I hope can land >> in 3.10 as well. >> >> Sneaking it in through the fixes branch would make life easier for us, >> but it doesn't feel right. > Arnd, can you pick this up into the arm-soc tree now? It would be good > to get this into next so that conflicts are avoided later on. > Arnd? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation