From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, arjan@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de,
pjt@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de,
morten.rasmussen@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
len.brown@intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, jkosina@suse.cz,
clark.williams@gmail.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
keescook@chromium.org, mgorman@suse.de, riel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch v3 0/8] sched: use runnable avg in load balance
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 16:35:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <515A9859.6000606@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <515A877B.3020908@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 04/02/2013 03:23 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
>> > [patch v3 8/8] sched: use instant load for burst wake up
> I've tested the patch set on 12 cpu X86 box with 3.9.0-rc2, and pgbench
> show regression on high-end this time.
>
> | db_size | clients | tps | | tps |
> +---------+---------+-------+ +-------+
> | 22 MB | 1 | 10662 | | 10446 |
> | 22 MB | 2 | 21483 | | 20887 |
> | 22 MB | 4 | 42046 | | 41266 |
> | 22 MB | 8 | 55807 | | 51987 |
> | 22 MB | 12 | 50768 | | 50974 |
> | 22 MB | 16 | 49880 | | 49510 |
> | 22 MB | 24 | 45904 | | 42398 |
> | 22 MB | 32 | 43420 | | 40995 |
> | 7484 MB | 1 | 7965 | | 7376 |
> | 7484 MB | 2 | 19354 | | 19149 |
> | 7484 MB | 4 | 37552 | | 37458 |
> | 7484 MB | 8 | 48655 | | 46618 |
> | 7484 MB | 12 | 45778 | | 45756 |
> | 7484 MB | 16 | 45659 | | 44911 |
> | 7484 MB | 24 | 42192 | | 37185 | -11.87%
> | 7484 MB | 32 | 36385 | | 34447 |
> | 15 GB | 1 | 7677 | | 7359 |
> | 15 GB | 2 | 19227 | | 19049 |
> | 15 GB | 4 | 37335 | | 36947 |
> | 15 GB | 8 | 48130 | | 46898 |
> | 15 GB | 12 | 45393 | | 43986 |
> | 15 GB | 16 | 45110 | | 45719 |
> | 15 GB | 24 | 41415 | | 36813 | -11.11%
> | 15 GB | 32 | 35988 | | 34025 |
>
> The reason may caused by wake_affine()'s higher overhead, and pgbench is
> really sensitive to this stuff...
Thanks for testing. Could you like to remove the last patch and test it
again? I want to know if the last patch has effect on pgbench.
--
Thanks Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-02 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-02 3:23 [patch v3 0/8] sched: use runnable avg in load balance Alex Shi
2013-04-02 3:23 ` [patch v3 1/8] Revert "sched: Introduce temporary FAIR_GROUP_SCHED dependency for load-tracking" Alex Shi
2013-04-02 3:23 ` [patch v3 2/8] sched: set initial value of runnable avg for new forked task Alex Shi
2013-04-02 3:23 ` [patch v3 3/8] sched: only count runnable avg on cfs_rq's nr_running Alex Shi
2013-04-03 3:19 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-02 3:23 ` [patch v3 4/8] sched: update cpu load after task_tick Alex Shi
2013-04-02 3:23 ` [patch v3 5/8] sched: compute runnable load avg in cpu_load and cpu_avg_load_per_task Alex Shi
2013-04-02 3:23 ` [patch v3 6/8] sched: consider runnable load average in move_tasks Alex Shi
2013-04-09 7:08 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-09 8:05 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-09 8:58 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-09 10:38 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-09 11:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-09 14:48 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-09 15:16 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-10 2:31 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-10 6:07 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-10 6:55 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-02 3:23 ` [patch v3 7/8] sched: consider runnable load average in effective_load Alex Shi
2013-04-02 3:23 ` [patch v3 8/8] sched: use instant load for burst wake up Alex Shi
2013-04-02 7:23 ` [patch v3 0/8] sched: use runnable avg in load balance Michael Wang
2013-04-02 8:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-04-02 9:13 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-02 8:35 ` Alex Shi [this message]
2013-04-02 9:45 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-03 2:46 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-03 2:56 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-03 3:23 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-03 4:28 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-03 5:38 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-03 5:53 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-03 6:01 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-03 6:22 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-03 6:53 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-03 7:18 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-03 7:28 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-03 8:46 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-03 9:37 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-03 11:17 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-07 3:09 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-07 7:30 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-07 8:56 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-09 5:08 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-10 13:12 ` Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=515A9859.6000606@intel.com \
--to=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=clark.williams@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox