linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@abilis.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Pierrick Hascoet <pierrick.hascoet@abilis.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add implicit barriers to irqsave/restore class of functions
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 18:59:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <515C2EC0.4090904@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364994622-14110-1-git-send-email-christian.ruppert@abilis.com>

Hi Christian,

On 04/03/2013 06:40 PM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> This patch adds implicit memory barriers to irqsave/restore functions of
> the ARC architecture port in line with what is done in other architectures.
>
> It seems to fix several seemingly unrelated issues in our platform but for
> the moment it is insufficiently tested (and might even be incomplete).
> Please comment.

I think this is not needed. Semantically we need barrier for spinlocks, not irq
save/restore - although spin locks are one of the primary users of irq
save/restore API.

So repeating what Thomas already said, the barrier already exists for
PREEMPT_COUNT, we need to make sure they are present for !PREEMPT_COUNT.

-Vineet

> Signed-off-by: Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@abilis.com>
> ---
>  arch/arc/include/asm/irqflags.h |    8 ++++----
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/irqflags.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/irqflags.h
> index ccd8480..c8147d1 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/include/asm/irqflags.h
> +++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/irqflags.h
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static inline long arch_local_irq_save(void)
>  	"	flag.nz %0		\n"
>  	: "=r"(temp), "=r"(flags)
>  	: "n"((STATUS_E1_MASK | STATUS_E2_MASK))
> -	: "cc");
> +	: "memory", "cc");
>  
>  	return flags;
>  }
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long flags)
>  	__asm__ __volatile__(
>  	"	flag %0			\n"
>  	:
> -	: "r"(flags));
> +	: "r"(flags) : "memory");
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void)
>  	"	and %0, %0, %1		\n"
>  	"	flag %0			\n"
>  	: "=&r"(temp)
> -	: "n"(~(STATUS_E1_MASK | STATUS_E2_MASK)));
> +	: "n"(~(STATUS_E1_MASK | STATUS_E2_MASK)) : "memory");
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static inline long arch_local_save_flags(void)
>  
>  	__asm__ __volatile__(
>  	"	lr  %0, [status32]	\n"
> -	: "=&r"(temp));
> +	: "=&r"(temp) : : "memory");
>  
>  	return temp;
>  }


  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-03 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-29 10:33 [PATCH] timer: Fix possible issues with non serialized timer_pending( ) Vineet Gupta
2013-04-03  7:20 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-04-03  8:53 ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-03 12:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-03 13:03   ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-03 13:10     ` [RFC] Add implicit barriers to irqsave/restore class of functions Christian Ruppert
2013-04-03 13:29       ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2013-04-04  8:26         ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-04 16:13       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-05  4:27         ` Vineet Gupta
2013-04-03 14:11   ` [PATCH] [PATCH] Gaurantee spinlocks implicit barrier for !PREEMPT_COUNT Vineet Gupta
2013-04-04 15:28     ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-05  4:36       ` Vineet Gupta
2013-04-06 13:34         ` Vineet Gupta
2013-04-06 16:13           ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-06 18:01             ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-06 19:54               ` Jacquiot, Aurelien
2013-04-09 16:33               ` [PATCH] tile: comment assumption about __insn_mtspr for <asm/irqflags.h> Chris Metcalf
2013-04-08  4:20             ` [PATCH] [PATCH] Gaurantee spinlocks implicit barrier for !PREEMPT_COUNT Vineet Gupta
2013-04-08  4:48               ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-08 13:37                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-08 14:31                   ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-08 14:50                     ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-08 14:59                       ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-08 15:07                         ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-09 14:32                           ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-10  7:12                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-08 14:05                 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-08  4:49               ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=515C2EC0.4090904@synopsys.com \
    --to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
    --cc=christian.ruppert@abilis.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pierrick.hascoet@abilis.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).