From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@abilis.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Pierrick Hascoet <pierrick.hascoet@abilis.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add implicit barriers to irqsave/restore class of functions
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 18:59:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <515C2EC0.4090904@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364994622-14110-1-git-send-email-christian.ruppert@abilis.com>
Hi Christian,
On 04/03/2013 06:40 PM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> This patch adds implicit memory barriers to irqsave/restore functions of
> the ARC architecture port in line with what is done in other architectures.
>
> It seems to fix several seemingly unrelated issues in our platform but for
> the moment it is insufficiently tested (and might even be incomplete).
> Please comment.
I think this is not needed. Semantically we need barrier for spinlocks, not irq
save/restore - although spin locks are one of the primary users of irq
save/restore API.
So repeating what Thomas already said, the barrier already exists for
PREEMPT_COUNT, we need to make sure they are present for !PREEMPT_COUNT.
-Vineet
> Signed-off-by: Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@abilis.com>
> ---
> arch/arc/include/asm/irqflags.h | 8 ++++----
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/irqflags.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/irqflags.h
> index ccd8480..c8147d1 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/include/asm/irqflags.h
> +++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/irqflags.h
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static inline long arch_local_irq_save(void)
> " flag.nz %0 \n"
> : "=r"(temp), "=r"(flags)
> : "n"((STATUS_E1_MASK | STATUS_E2_MASK))
> - : "cc");
> + : "memory", "cc");
>
> return flags;
> }
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long flags)
> __asm__ __volatile__(
> " flag %0 \n"
> :
> - : "r"(flags));
> + : "r"(flags) : "memory");
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void)
> " and %0, %0, %1 \n"
> " flag %0 \n"
> : "=&r"(temp)
> - : "n"(~(STATUS_E1_MASK | STATUS_E2_MASK)));
> + : "n"(~(STATUS_E1_MASK | STATUS_E2_MASK)) : "memory");
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static inline long arch_local_save_flags(void)
>
> __asm__ __volatile__(
> " lr %0, [status32] \n"
> - : "=&r"(temp));
> + : "=&r"(temp) : : "memory");
>
> return temp;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-03 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-29 10:33 [PATCH] timer: Fix possible issues with non serialized timer_pending( ) Vineet Gupta
2013-04-03 7:20 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-04-03 8:53 ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-03 12:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-03 13:03 ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-03 13:10 ` [RFC] Add implicit barriers to irqsave/restore class of functions Christian Ruppert
2013-04-03 13:29 ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2013-04-04 8:26 ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-04 16:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-05 4:27 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-04-03 14:11 ` [PATCH] [PATCH] Gaurantee spinlocks implicit barrier for !PREEMPT_COUNT Vineet Gupta
2013-04-04 15:28 ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-05 4:36 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-04-06 13:34 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-04-06 16:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-06 18:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-06 19:54 ` Jacquiot, Aurelien
2013-04-09 16:33 ` [PATCH] tile: comment assumption about __insn_mtspr for <asm/irqflags.h> Chris Metcalf
2013-04-08 4:20 ` [PATCH] [PATCH] Gaurantee spinlocks implicit barrier for !PREEMPT_COUNT Vineet Gupta
2013-04-08 4:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-08 13:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-08 14:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-08 14:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-08 14:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-08 15:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-09 14:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-10 7:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-08 14:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-08 4:49 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=515C2EC0.4090904@synopsys.com \
--to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=christian.ruppert@abilis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pierrick.hascoet@abilis.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).