From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763347Ab3DCTZs (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:25:48 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:24287 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763210Ab3DCTZq (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:25:46 -0400 Message-ID: <515C818B.5070700@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:22:51 -0400 From: Rik van Riel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Naoya Horiguchi CC: Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , Hugh Dickins , KOSAKI Motohiro , Konstantin Khlebnikov , Michal Hocko , HATAYAMA Daisuke , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] fix hugetlb memory check in vma_dump_size() References: <1365014138-19589-1-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> <1365014138-19589-3-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> In-Reply-To: <1365014138-19589-3-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/03/2013 02:35 PM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt says about coredump_filter bitmask, > > Note bit 0-4 doesn't effect any hugetlb memory. hugetlb memory are only > effected by bit 5-6. > > However current code can go into the subsequent flag checks of bit 0-4 > for vma(VM_HUGETLB). So this patch inserts 'return' and makes it work > as written in the document. > > Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel