From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@podlesie.net>
Cc: Ronald <ronald645@gmail.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
gwendal@google.com, jgarzik@redhat.com
Subject: Re: ata: HDIO_DRIVE_* ioctl() Linux 3.9 regression
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 19:49:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <515CBFFA.3090907@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130327125114.GA22214@shrek.podlesie.net>
On 03/27/2013 08:51 AM, Krzysztof Mazur wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 06:26:50PM +0100, Ronald wrote:
>> In reply to [1]: I have the same issue. Git bisect took 50+ rebuilds xD
>>
>> Smartd does not work anymore since 84a9a8cd9 ([libata] Set proper SK
>> when CK_COND is set.).
>>
>> I hope I'm not stepping on anyone's toe's by chosing the same title.
>> I'm not subscribed to this list.
>>
>> Just wanted to add a 'me2'
>>
>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ide/msg45268.html
>
> It seems that the SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION is not cleared
> causing -EIO, because that patch modified sensebuf and
> the check for clearing SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION is no longer valid.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> index 318b413..ff44787 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> @@ -532,8 +532,8 @@ int ata_cmd_ioctl(struct scsi_device *scsidev, void __user *arg)
> struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;
> scsi_normalize_sense(sensebuf, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE,
> &sshdr);
> - if (sshdr.sense_key == 0 &&
> - sshdr.asc == 0 && sshdr.ascq == 0)
> + if (sshdr.sense_key == RECOVERED_ERROR &&
> + sshdr.asc == 0 && sshdr.ascq == 0x1d)
> cmd_result &= ~SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION;
> }
>
> @@ -618,8 +618,8 @@ int ata_task_ioctl(struct scsi_device *scsidev, void __user *arg)
> struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;
> scsi_normalize_sense(sensebuf, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE,
> &sshdr);
> - if (sshdr.sense_key == 0 &&
> - sshdr.asc == 0 && sshdr.ascq == 0)
> + if (sshdr.sense_key == RECOVERED_ERROR &&
> + sshdr.asc == 0 && sshdr.ascq == 0x1d)
> cmd_result &= ~SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION;
applied
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-03 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-25 17:26 ata: HDIO_DRIVE_* ioctl() Linux 3.9 regression Ronald
2013-03-27 12:51 ` Krzysztof Mazur
2013-04-03 23:49 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2013-03-29 15:26 ` [PATCH] [libata] Fix HDIO_DRIVE_CMD ioctl sense data check Gwendal Grignou
2013-03-29 16:10 ` Krzysztof Mazur
2013-03-29 17:06 ` Gwendal Grignou
2013-03-29 17:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Gwendal Grignou
2013-03-29 17:12 ` Gwendal Grignou
2013-03-29 17:47 ` Krzysztof Mazur
2013-03-29 20:01 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-03-30 21:43 ` [PATCH v3] " Gwendal Grignou
2013-03-29 15:28 ` ata: HDIO_DRIVE_* ioctl() Linux 3.9 regression Gwendal Grignou
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-23 8:20 Krzysztof Mazur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=515CBFFA.3090907@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=gwendal@google.com \
--cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
--cc=krzysiek@podlesie.net \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ronald645@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).