Re: [GIT PULL] at91: DT changes for 3.10 #2

[Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>]

On 04/03/2013 09:45 AM, Nicolas Ferre :
> On 04/02/2013 08:49 PM, Olof Johansson :
>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 03:59:39PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>>> Arnd, Olof,
>>>
>>> Here is a pull-request for AT91 that is dedicated to Device Tree
>>> modifications. It is stacked on the material that you already have
>>> for 3.10 in your arm-soc/at91/dt branch.
>>> Following our discussion with Arnd, I added the non-urgent patches that I
>>> already proposed too late for 3.9. I also included the moving of macb node
>>> and kept the original patch.
>>>
>>> Thanks, best regards,
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit 6901d947be5ba1245a0f63271355b95f9056a362:
>>>
>>>   ARM: at91/at91sam9x5cm: add 1-wire chip on CM board (2013-03-21 16:07:15 +0100)
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>
>>>   git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-dt
>>>
>>> for you to fetch changes up to cc2e191b0ccc5a987fdb29261ab9c264c608924d:
>>>
>>>   ARM: at91/dt: fix macb node declaration (2013-03-29 10:02:04 +0100)
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> One macb DT node move for 9x5 family: 9g15 doesn't
>>> have an Ethernet interface.
>>> Little fixes mainly related to at91sam9x5 DT and the
>>> RTC addition.
>>> Addition of the Acme Systems Aria G25 board.
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Douglas Gilbert (1):
>>>       ARM: at91: add Acme Systems Aria G25 board
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just replied to the above patch -- please prefix the dts files with the
>> platform so it's easier to navigate the directory.

I do not want to spark a debate here, but moving to directories per
"mach" earlier would have made things easier. If I recall well,
Jean-Christophe has proposed it a long time ago...

> Yes, I have to make sure that everybody agree on our side...

The difficult point with this prefix... well it is difficult to tell...
our product will never be called "at91" again!
So, yes, our Linux identity is still "at91" and we are pretty attached
to it but our newer products are named "sam" + "core" + "product family"
which results in our newer family: "sama5d3" (note the at91 is missing)...

=> anyway, we think that the at91 prefix is still vivid in Linux
community and we consider it as a good choice for now.
So, I may rename the newly introduced "sama5d3*.dts[i]" files with
"at91-sama5d3*.dts[i]" (while .c/.h files will remain the same).

>> Otherwise the branch contents looks good, so send a fresh request when you've
>> respun.
>>
>> Also, the new dts isn't added to the Makefile, please add it.
> 
> Ok, I will do. Maybe I can also stack a DT related patch about ADC
> support that I was planning to add in another pull-request covering the
> same topic.
> 
> Thanks, best regards,
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre