From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk: start bypass mode in blk_unregister_queue
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 22:24:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <515D8D38.3060009@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130404142058.GF9425@htj.dyndns.org>
On 04/04/2013 10:20 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:16:39PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
>> It probably wouldn't happen for normal user, only for some SCSI driver
>> developers like me, e.g. the sr_mod will normally load during boot, and
>> when I made some changes to the code, I'll unload the driver and reload
>> it. This is found when I was developing ZPODD code and I just found some
>> time to see what happened.
>
> Does that unregister and register the same queue? Ah, crap, it does.
>
>> The queue for the scsi device will always be there, the queue(and the
>> device) will not go away on driver unregistration. So it will be left in
>> normal mode, and on next blk_register_queue call, the warning will show
>> up.
>>
>>> Starting a bypass mode can be very expensive and some drivers create
>>> and destroy a lot of queues during probing. We don't want a call to
>>> blk_queue_bypass_start() on every queue creation / destruction cycle.
>>
>> By expensive, do you mean the drain of the queue? Since the queue is to
>> be unregistered, I suppose the queue has to be drained somewhere?
>
> The problematic one is synchronize_rcu(). It adds up pretty quickly.
> I'd suggest just skipping blk_queue_bypass_end() during registration
> if the queue is not bypassing.
OK, thanks for the suggestion!
-Aaron
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-04 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1364308501-1640-1-git-send-email-aaron.lu@intel.com>
2013-04-04 14:01 ` [PATCH] blk: start bypass mode in blk_unregister_queue Aaron Lu
2013-04-04 14:03 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-04 14:16 ` Aaron Lu
2013-04-04 14:20 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-04 14:24 ` Aaron Lu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=515D8D38.3060009@intel.com \
--to=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox