From: Phillip Susi <psusi@ubuntu.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Loopback device hung [was Re: xfs deadlock on 3.9-rc5 running xfstests case #78]
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:30:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <515DE2FE.1080201@ubuntu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <515C4D9D.10103@ubuntu.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 829 bytes --]
> I have not tested it yet, but I am pretty sure it won't work. It
> looks like the patch changes the BLKRRPART path to go ahead and remove
> existing partitions when GENHD_FL_NO_PARTSCAN is set. loop doesn't
> issue the BLKRRPART ioctl when !LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN so this won't help.
> I think loop needs to set GENHD_FL_NO_PARTSCAN and then issue the
> ioctl regardless of the LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN flag to get the partitions
> to be removed. I will try to test tonight.
After testing, my initial thoughts appeared to have been correct. I had
to modify the patch as follows. To test, simply do:
truncate -s 10m img
losetup /dev/loop0 img
parted /dev/loop0
mklabel msdos
mkpart primary ext2 1m 2m
quit
ls /dev/loop0*
Note the /dev/loop0p1 node. Run losetup -d /dev/loop0 and see if it is
still there.
[-- Attachment #1.2: loop.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1722 bytes --]
diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c
index a31d91d..8b78b5a 100644
--- a/block/ioctl.c
+++ b/block/ioctl.c
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static int blkdev_reread_part(struct block_device *bdev)
struct gendisk *disk = bdev->bd_disk;
int res;
- if (!disk_part_scan_enabled(disk) || bdev != bdev->bd_contains)
+ if (bdev != bdev->bd_contains)
return -EINVAL;
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EACCES;
diff --git a/block/partition-generic.c b/block/partition-generic.c
index 1cb4dec..0e7d637 100644
--- a/block/partition-generic.c
+++ b/block/partition-generic.c
@@ -430,6 +430,15 @@ rescan:
disk->fops->revalidate_disk(disk);
check_disk_size_change(disk, bdev);
bdev->bd_invalidated = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * If partition scanning is disabled, we are done.
+ */
+ if (!disk_part_scan_enabled(disk)) {
+ kobject_uevent(&disk_to_dev(disk)->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
if (!get_capacity(disk) || !(state = check_partition(disk, bdev)))
return 0;
if (IS_ERR(state)) {
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index 8bc6d39..326fac9 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -1039,11 +1039,9 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
lo->lo_state = Lo_unbound;
/* This is safe: open() is still holding a reference. */
module_put(THIS_MODULE);
- if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN && bdev)
- ioctl_by_bdev(bdev, BLKRRPART, 0);
+ lo->lo_disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
+ ioctl_by_bdev(bdev, BLKRRPART, 0);
lo->lo_flags = 0;
- if (!part_shift)
- lo->lo_disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
/*
* Need not hold lo_ctl_mutex to fput backing file.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 553 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-04 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1462091996.435156.1364882416199.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
2013-04-02 6:08 ` xfs deadlock on 3.9-rc5 running xfstests case #78 CAI Qian
2013-04-02 7:05 ` Loopback device hung [was Re: xfs deadlock on 3.9-rc5 running xfstests case #78] Dave Chinner
2013-04-02 7:19 ` Jens Axboe
2013-04-02 7:30 ` Jens Axboe
2013-04-02 8:39 ` CAI Qian
2013-04-02 9:00 ` Jens Axboe
2013-04-02 9:31 ` CAI Qian
2013-04-02 9:48 ` Jens Axboe
2013-04-03 11:41 ` Jens Axboe
2013-04-03 15:41 ` Phillip Susi
2013-04-04 20:30 ` Phillip Susi [this message]
2013-04-09 6:55 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-09 7:01 ` Jens Axboe
2013-04-09 7:08 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-10 7:24 ` Jens Axboe
2013-05-28 14:51 ` Phillip Susi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=515DE2FE.1080201@ubuntu.com \
--to=psusi@ubuntu.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=caiqian@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox