public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: auditfilter: looping issue, memory leak if has 2 or more AUDIT_FILTERKEYs
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:10:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <516637BB.90606@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2119919725.12278128.1365628773876.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>

On 2013年04月11日 05:19, Eric Paris wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> 
>> >   b. has an new issue for AUDIT_DIR:
>> >        after AUDIT_DIR succeed, it will set rule->tree.
>> >        next, the other case fail, then will call audit_free_rule.
>> >        but audit_free_rule will not free rule->tree.
> Definitely a couple of leaks here...
> 
> I'm seeing leaks on size 8, 64, and 128.
> 
> Al, what do you think?  Should I be calling audit_put_tree() in the error case if entry->tree != NULL?  The audit trees are some of the most complex code in the kernel I think.
> 
> 

  can we add it in audit_free_rule ?

  maybe like this:

@@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ static inline void audit_free_rule(struct audit_entry *e)
 	/* some rules don't have associated watches */
 	if (erule->watch)
 		audit_put_watch(erule->watch);
+	if (erule->tree)
+		audit_put_tree(erule->tree);
 	if (erule->fields)
 		for (i = 0; i < erule->field_count; i++) {
 			struct audit_field *f = &erule->fields[i];


  thanks.

  :-)

-- 
Chen Gang

Asianux Corporation

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-11  4:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-10  9:52 [PATCH] kernel: auditfilter: looping issue, memory leak if has 2 or more AUDIT_FILTERKEYs Chen Gang
2013-04-10 10:18 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-10 10:28   ` Chen Gang
2013-04-10 10:36     ` Chen Gang
2013-04-10 21:38       ` Eric Paris
2013-04-11  1:12         ` Chen Gang
2013-04-10 21:32     ` Eric Paris
2013-04-11  3:43       ` Chen Gang
2013-04-10 20:29   ` Eric Paris
2013-04-11  3:55     ` Chen Gang
2013-04-10 21:19   ` Eric Paris
2013-04-11  4:10     ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-04-11 13:40       ` Eric Paris
2013-04-11 14:34         ` Chen Gang
2013-04-11 14:52           ` Chen Gang
2013-04-12  9:42       ` Chen Gang
2013-04-16 10:25         ` Chen Gang
2013-04-16 10:38           ` Chen Gang
2013-04-17  2:41             ` Chen Gang
2013-04-17  4:23               ` [PATCH v2] kernel: auditfilter: resource management, tree and watch will memory leak when failure occurs Chen Gang
2013-04-10 20:08 ` [PATCH] kernel: auditfilter: looping issue, memory leak if has 2 or more AUDIT_FILTERKEYs Eric Paris
2013-04-11  3:56   ` Chen Gang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=516637BB.90606@asianux.com \
    --to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox