public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
	Eric Northup <digitaleric@google.com>,
	Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>,
	Julien Tinnes <jln@google.com>, Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] x86: kaslr: relocate base offset at boot
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 20:06:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <516A1D49.1050100@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQXGjJCDAo41jxpy9bZJ2svKy8YY-zX7O4YDZPhKo7M43g@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/13/2013 05:37 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 
> so decompress code position is changed?
> 
> You may push out bss and other data area of run-time kernel of limit
> that boot loader
> chose according to setup_header.init_size.
> aka that make those area overlap with ram hole or other area like
> boot command line or initrd....
> 

Is there a strong reason to randomize the physical address on 64 bits
(and if so, shouldn't we do it right?)

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.


  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-14  3:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-12 20:13 [PATCH v2 0/6] kernel ASLR Kees Cook
2013-04-12 20:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86: relocs: generalize Elf structure names Kees Cook
2013-04-16 23:17   ` [tip:x86/kaslr] x86, relocs: Generalize ELF " tip-bot for Kees Cook
2013-04-12 20:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86: relocs: consolidate processing logic Kees Cook
2013-04-16 23:18   ` [tip:x86/kaslr] x86, relocs: Consolidate " tip-bot for Kees Cook
2013-04-12 20:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86: relocs: add 64-bit ELF support to relocs tool Kees Cook
2013-04-16 23:19   ` [tip:x86/kaslr] x86, relocs: Add " tip-bot for Kees Cook
2013-04-12 20:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86: relocs: build separate 32/64-bit tools Kees Cook
2013-04-16 22:21   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-16 22:38     ` Kees Cook
2013-04-16 22:39       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-16 23:20   ` [tip:x86/kaslr] x86, relocs: Build " tip-bot for Kees Cook
2013-04-16 23:22   ` [tip:x86/kaslr] x86, relocs: Refactor the relocs tool to merge 32- and 64-bit ELF tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-12 20:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86: kaslr: routines to choose random base offset Kees Cook
2013-04-14  0:11   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-04-12 20:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86: kaslr: relocate base offset at boot Kees Cook
2013-04-14  0:37   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-04-14  3:06     ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-04-15 21:06       ` Eric Northup
2013-04-15 21:25         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-15 21:41           ` Kees Cook
2013-04-15 21:44             ` Eric Northup
2013-04-15 21:46             ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-15 21:59               ` Kees Cook
2013-04-16  2:31                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-16  2:40                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-16 16:08                     ` Kees Cook
2013-04-15 22:00               ` Yinghai Lu
2013-04-15 22:07                 ` Kees Cook
2013-04-15 22:38                   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-04-15 22:42                     ` Kees Cook
2013-04-15 22:57                       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-04-16  2:34                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-16  2:36                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-16  2:56                   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-04-16  3:02                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-16 13:08                       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-16 13:27                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-16 18:08 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] kernel ASLR Kees Cook
2013-04-16 18:15   ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=516A1D49.1050100@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=digitaleric@google.com \
    --cc=drosenberg@vsecurity.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com \
    --cc=jln@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mjg@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox