From: "Bengt Jönsson" <bengt.g.jonsson@stericsson.com>
To: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Yvan FILLION <yvan.fillion@stericsson.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: ab8500: Fix get_mode for shared mode regulators
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:03:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <516BB444.7010508@stericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365424274.21989.2.camel@phoenix>
On 04/08/2013 02:31 PM, Axel Lin wrote:
> The special handling code for getting shared mode status is wrong
> because it needs to check info->shared_mode->lp_mode_req for
> both regulators that shared the same mode register.
>
> In set_mode(), current code ensures we won't set mode to REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE
> if only one of the regulator requests to set idle.
>
> In get_mode(), we can just remove the special handling code for shared mode.
> Read the register value always returns correct status no matter the regulator
> has shared mode register or not.
I am not convinced about this patch. The purpose of the original code is
that the regulator framework should be unaware that the mode register is
shared with another regulator. If we apply this patch, get_mode may
return different results depending on the other regulators mode settings.
Let me take an example: The other shared regulator is already set to LP
mode and the current regulator is requested to low power mode. Then the
framework first checks current mode and compares to requested mode. If
equal, it returns. With this patch applied, it will see that the
regulator is already set to LP mode and return without calling set_mode
in the driver. However, the state information in the driver will be
wrong so when the other regulator is requested to HP mode and back to LP
mode it will not actually set LP mode again to HW.
Regards,
Bengt
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/ab8500.c | 8 --------
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/ab8500.c b/drivers/regulator/ab8500.c
> index 9ebd131..acdffc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/ab8500.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/ab8500.c
> @@ -456,14 +456,6 @@ static unsigned int ab8500_regulator_get_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - /* Need special handling for shared mode */
> - if (info->shared_mode) {
> - if (info->shared_mode->lp_mode_req)
> - return REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE;
> - else
> - return REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL;
> - }
> -
> if (info->mode_mask) {
> /* Dedicated register for handling mode */
> ret = abx500_get_register_interruptible(info->dev,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-15 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-08 12:31 [PATCH] regulator: ab8500: Fix get_mode for shared mode regulators Axel Lin
2013-04-13 14:10 ` Axel Lin
2013-04-15 8:09 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-15 8:03 ` Bengt Jönsson [this message]
2013-04-15 8:34 ` Axel Lin
2013-04-15 8:50 ` Axel Lin
2013-04-15 11:34 ` Bengt Jönsson
2013-04-15 12:13 ` Axel Lin
2013-04-15 12:41 ` Bengt Jönsson
2013-04-15 14:11 ` Axel Lin
2013-04-15 14:48 ` Bengt Jönsson
2013-04-15 16:07 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=516BB444.7010508@stericsson.com \
--to=bengt.g.jonsson@stericsson.com \
--cc=axel.lin@ingics.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yvan.fillion@stericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox