From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] cpuset: don't update tasks' cpumask and nodemask in an empty cpuset
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 09:06:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5171EA24.3070001@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130419183618.GC13811@mtj.dyndns.org>
On 2013/4/20 2:36, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Li.
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 08:27:05PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> I think this was introduced unintentionally when cpuset hotplug was
>> made asynchronous. Fortunately it does no harm, as updating tasks'
>> cpumask will just return failure and there's a guarantee_online_mems()
>> when updating nodemask, and then the tasks will be moved to an ancestor
>> cpuset.
>
> Yeah, which will update the masks to the proper values anyway, so it
> was intentionally written that way as it didn't really matter either
> way. I suppose this helps future changes? Maybe update the
> description a bit?
>
I was trying to fix a bug: before moving tasks out of empty cpusets,
update_tasks_nodemask() is called, which calls do_migrate_pages(xx, from, to)
finally, from == node_to_be_offlined, to == empty_nodeamsk, so I guess
no pages will be migrated.
Then when those tasks are moving to an ancestor, do_migrate_pages(xx, from, to)
is called again, from == empty_nodemask, to == ancestor's nodemask,
so I guess again no pages will be migrated.
This bug exists even before your changes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-20 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-19 12:25 [PATCH 00/10] cpuset: implement sane hierarchy behaviors Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:25 ` [PATCH 01/10] cpuset: remove redundant check in cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:25 ` [PATCH 02/10] cpuset: cleanup guarantee_online_{cpus|mems}() Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:26 ` [PATCH 03/10] cpuset: remove unnecessary variable in cpuset_attach() Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:26 ` [PATCH 04/10] cpuset: remove cpuset_test_cpumask() Li Zefan
2013-04-19 18:27 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-19 12:27 ` [PATCH 05/10] cpuset: don't update tasks' cpumask and nodemask in an empty cpuset Li Zefan
2013-04-19 18:36 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-20 1:06 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2013-04-21 1:42 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-19 12:27 ` [PATCH 06/10] cpuset: re-structure update_cpumask() a bit Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:28 ` [PATCH 07/10] cpuset: record old_mems_allowed in struct cpuset Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:28 ` [PATCH 08/10] cpuset: introduce effective_{cpumask|nodemask}_cpuset() Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:29 ` [PATCH 09/10] cpuset: allow to keep tasks in empty cpusets Li Zefan
2013-04-19 20:58 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-20 1:22 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-21 1:41 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-19 12:29 ` [PATCH 10/10] cpuset: allow to move tasks to " Li Zefan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5171EA24.3070001@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox