From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: arjan@infradead.org, james.hogan@imgtec.com,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
andy.shevchenko@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_32: Fix module version table mismatch.
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:56:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <517711A7.8090002@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201304232140.FGF73904.QJOFOVtHFFMSOL@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
On 04/23/2013 05:40 AM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Commit a4b6a77b "module: fix symbol versioning with symbol prefixes" broke
> loading of net/ipv6/ipv6.ko built with CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=y for x86_32.
>
> # modprobe ipv6
> FATAL: Error inserting ipv6 (/lib/modules/3.9.0-rc8-next-20130422/kernel/net/ipv6/ipv6.ko): Invalid argument
> # dmesg
> ipv6: no symbol version for memcmp
> ipv6: Unknown symbol memcmp (err -22)
>
> The reason for breakage is that check_version() in kernel/module.c tries to
> find symname == "memcmp" but versions[i].name == "__builtin_memcmp".
>
> The reason for versions[i].name == "__builtin_memcmp" is that
> memcmp() for x86_32 is defined as
>
> #define memcmp __builtin_memcmp
>
> in arch/x86/include/asm/string_32.h while memcmp() for x86_64 is defined as
>
> int memcmp(const void *cs, const void *ct, size_t count);
>
> in arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h.
>
> Since __builtin_memcmp is a gcc's built-in function which might emit a call to
> memcmp, __builtin_memcmp should not be used for versions[i].name field.
>
> In order to make sure that versions[i].name == "memcmp", make the definition of
> memcmp() for x86_32 identical with that of x86_64.
>
I'm still confused by all of this. VMLINUX_SYMBOL_STR() ought to be a
noop on x86, so how on Earth could a4b6a77b break anything?
Secondly, although memcmp is a macro, it is #undef'd before the
definition in lib/string.c, which is the one that is exported.
I'm wondering if the real culprit isn't b92021b0, but I'm looking into
it now.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-23 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAHp75VdDwh0wgCWrVDcPps1C2qfdDZra15y9BQvzfWHzSMqbWA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-12 15:08 ` memcmp in modules Andy Shevchenko
2013-04-22 14:26 ` Tetsuo Handa
2013-04-23 12:40 ` [PATCH] x86_32: Fix module version table mismatch Tetsuo Handa
2013-04-23 14:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-04-23 15:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-23 15:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-04-23 22:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-23 22:56 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-04-24 0:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-24 1:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-24 10:13 ` James Hogan
2013-04-24 11:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-04-24 12:28 ` Tetsuo Handa
2013-04-24 13:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-04-24 17:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2] modpost: fix unwanted VMLINUX_SYMBOL_STR expansion James Hogan
2013-04-29 2:10 ` Rusty Russell
2013-04-23 23:15 ` memcmp in modules H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=517711A7.8090002@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox