From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS lost on x86 with ALWAYS_USE_PERSISTENT_CLOCK changes?
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:19:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51774F44.2060704@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPXgP128yAq1jju-gsZcaS-mZPt+7tq0tt-uVk3Yqr77abd26Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/23/2013 08:05 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:43 AM, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 04/23/2013 06:34 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> what's the intention of:
>>> e90c83f757fffdacec8b3c5eee5617dcc038338f ?
>>> x86: Select HAS_PERSISTENT_CLOCK on x86
>>>
>>> It unconditionally sets:
>>> HAS_PERSISTENT_CLOCK
>>> but:
>>> RTC_SYSTOHC
>>> got a depends on !HAS_PERSISTENT_CLOCK
>>>
>>> This makes it impossible to sync the system time from the RTC on x86.
>>> What's going on here?
>>
>> So I suspect just some confusion, but let me know if thats wrong and you're
>> actually seeing an issue.
>>
>> SYSTOHC is what *sets the RTC* to the system time when we're synced with
>> NTP.
>>
>> HCTOSYS is what sets the system time from the RTC.
> Right, and RTC_HCTOSYS is not NTP related. It just reads the time from
> the RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE at bootup so we do not boot in 1970 time mode.
> We need that it in all cases, at every bootup on x86. But it's no
> longer there with the above commits. :)
On x86 the persistent_clock() is backed by the
CMOS/EFI/kvm-wall/xen/vrtc clock (all via x86_platform.get_wallclock)
should be present and we'll initialize the time in timekeeping_init() there.
Its only systems where there isn't a persistent_clock is where the RTC
layer and the HCTOSYS is helpful.
Again, if you're having a problem where an x86 system isn't getting its
time initialized correctly, please let me know the details of the system.
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-24 3:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-24 1:34 CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS lost on x86 with ALWAYS_USE_PERSISTENT_CLOCK changes? Kay Sievers
2013-04-24 2:43 ` John Stultz
2013-04-24 3:05 ` Kay Sievers
2013-04-24 3:19 ` John Stultz [this message]
2013-04-24 3:33 ` Kay Sievers
2013-04-24 3:51 ` Kay Sievers
2013-04-24 16:33 ` John Stultz
2013-04-24 16:30 ` John Stultz
2013-04-24 16:51 ` Kay Sievers
2013-04-24 5:12 ` Alexander Holler
2013-04-24 16:07 ` John Stultz
2013-04-24 16:32 ` Kay Sievers
2013-04-24 16:42 ` John Stultz
2013-04-25 7:11 ` Alexander Holler
2013-04-25 16:01 ` Kay Sievers
2013-04-25 16:13 ` John Stultz
2013-04-25 18:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-04-25 19:45 ` Kay Sievers
2013-04-25 19:54 ` John Stultz
2013-04-25 20:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-04-25 20:03 ` John Stultz
2013-04-25 21:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51774F44.2060704@linaro.org \
--to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kay@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox