public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: Fix a build warning
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 12:17:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5177BF67.2040308@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130424105610.GA15815@gmail.com>

On 24/04/13 11:56, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> 
>> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
>>
>> Fix this:
>>
>> arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c: In function ???setup_efi_vars???:
>> arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c:269:2: warning: passing argument 1 of ???efi_call_phys??? makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default]
>> In file included from arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c:12:0:
>> /w/kernel/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h:8:33: note: expected ???void *??? but argument is of type ???long unsigned int???
>>
>> after cc5a080c5d40 ("efi: Pass boot services variable info to runtime
>> code").
>>
>> Cc: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
>> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
>> index 8615f7581820..41de115a55b7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
>> @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static efi_status_t setup_efi_vars(struct boot_params *params)
>>  	while (data && data->next)
>>  		data = (struct setup_data *)(unsigned long)data->next;
>>  
>> -	status = efi_call_phys4(sys_table->runtime->query_variable_info,
>> +	status = efi_call_phys4((void *)sys_table->runtime->query_variable_info,
>>  				EFI_VARIABLE_NON_VOLATILE |
>>  				EFI_VARIABLE_BOOTSERVICE_ACCESS |
>>  				EFI_VARIABLE_RUNTIME_ACCESS, &store_size,
> 
> Why isn't the query_variale_info field changed to void * instead? That way 
> no cast would be needed.

We could either change all fields in efi_system_table or the
efi_call_phys* prototypes. x86-64 already casts to (void *) when calling
efi_call0(), etc, though I'm not entirely sure why void * is needed.


  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-24 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-24 10:09 [PATCH] x86, efi: Fix a build warning Borislav Petkov
2013-04-24 10:29 ` Matt Fleming
2013-04-24 10:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-24 11:17   ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2013-04-24 13:20     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-25  6:55     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-25  7:19       ` Matt Fleming
2013-04-25  8:14         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-25 10:47         ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-25 11:40           ` Matt Fleming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5177BF67.2040308@intel.com \
    --to=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox