From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kconfig "softdepends" idea
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:10:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <517FA68B.20001@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130430103318.GB12161@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2150 bytes --]
On 04/30/2013 01:33 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:24:40PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>> So, my idea is to have a new kind of Kconfig dependency. I'll call it
>>> "softdepends" in lack of better name. A driver maintainer could use
>>> "softdepends on ARCH_OMAP", instead of "depends on ARCH_OMAP", to say
>>> that this driver does not actually build depend on ARCH_OMAP, but for
>>> all normal purposes it does.
>>>
>>> Normally, this would result in the same behavior as the normal
>>> "depends", and Linus would not get a questions whether he wants to
>>> enable this OMAP specific driver or not, and the driver would not be
>>> visible on the menuconfig.
>>>
>>> But the user could enable the driver if he explicitly so wants. Perhaps
>>> a Kconfig option such as "ignore softdepends", enabling of which would
>>> allow the user to enable the drivers that use softdepends. Or, maybe
>>> just require the user to add the config option manually into his .config.
>>
>> If I understand you correct this is already possible today without
>> extending the kconfig language.
>>
>> config OMAP_SPECIFIC_DRIVER
>> depends on ARCH_OMAP || SHOW_ALL_DRIVERS
>>
>>
>> If SHOW_ALL_DRIVERS are "y" then user can say "y" to the OMAP specific
>> driver too, even without ARCH_OMAP being selected.
>
> SHOW_ALL_DRIVERS might create another set of issues. If Linus isn't
> taking patches removing 'depends on ARCH_OMAP' would he take patches
> adding SHOW_ALL_DRIVERS ?
Wouldn't the SHOW_ALL_DRIVERS be just a one time query from Kconfig to
the user? So Linus only needs to say "n" once. Why would he object to that?
Then again, as a personal opinion, "depends on ARCH_OMAP ||
SHOW_ALL_DRIVERS" is not very descriptive. I'm not sure if that matters,
though. One doesn't need to read the Kconfig files every day =).
But presuming most of the drivers would use that, it would add quite a
bit of repetition to the Kconfig files. Well, ok, I have no idea how
many drivers have dependencies that could be removed.
So SHOW_ALL_DRIVERS sounds quite an easy solution to this.
Tomi
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 901 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-30 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-30 9:52 Kconfig "softdepends" idea Tomi Valkeinen
2013-04-30 10:24 ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-04-30 10:33 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-30 11:10 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2013-04-30 11:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-04-30 12:01 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-04-30 11:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=517FA68B.20001@ti.com \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox