Re: [PATCH V4 5/9] mtd: replace the hardcode with the onfi_feature()

Huang Shijie
2013-05-02T06:46:19Z

于 2013年05月02日 14:17, Gupta, Pekon 写道:
> [Pekon]: onfi_feature() is actually not useful unless someone re-scans the
I do not think so. :)

I think the onfi_feature() is useful in the future.
I only add the two feauture for this helper:
[1] 16-bit and
[2] extended parameter page

But in actually, we may add more feature to this helper, such as
_synchronous_.
For example, some driver may support the synchronous mode for the ONFI nand.
We can use this onfi_feature() in the driver to check if the onfi nand
supports this
synchronous feature.

Add this helper makes the code more readable, though we introduce a
little redandancy.

thanks
Huang Shijie