linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com>
Cc: mtosatti@redhat.com, gleb@redhat.com, avi.kivity@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: MMU: fast invalid all shadow pages
Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 14:00:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51835291.20400@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130503112729.942a04b2ba2566b35328f49e@gmail.com>

On 05/03/2013 10:27 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 11:13:20 +0800
> Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> +/*
>> + * Fast invalid all shadow pages belong to @slot.
>> + *
>> + * @slot != NULL means the invalidation is caused the memslot specified
>> + * by @slot is being deleted, in this case, we should ensure that rmap
>> + * and lpage-info of the @slot can not be used after calling the function.
>> + *
>> + * @slot == NULL means the invalidation due to other reasons, we need
> 
> The comment should explain what the "other reasons" are.
> But this API may better be split into two separate functions; it depends
> on the "other reasons".

NO.

> 
>> + * not care rmap and lpage-info since they are still valid after calling
>> + * the function.
>> + */
>> +void kvm_mmu_invalid_memslot_pages(struct kvm *kvm,
>> +				   struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> 
> You yourself is explaining this as "invalidation" in the comment.
> kvm_mmu_invalidate_shadow_pages_memslot() or something...

Umm, invalidate is a better name. Will update after collecting Marcelo, Gleb
and other guy's comments.


  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-03  6:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-27  3:13 [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: MMU: fast zap all shadow pages Xiao Guangrong
2013-04-27  3:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: MMU: drop unnecessary kvm_reload_remote_mmus Xiao Guangrong
2013-04-27  3:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: x86: introduce memslot_set_lpage_disallowed Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-03  2:10   ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-05-03  5:55     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-04-27  3:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: MMU: introduce kvm_clear_all_lpage_info Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-03  2:15   ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-05-03  5:57     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-04-27  3:13 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: MMU: fast invalid all shadow pages Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-03  1:05   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-03  5:52     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-03 15:53       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-03 16:51         ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-04  0:52           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-04  0:56             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-06  3:39             ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-06 12:36               ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-06 13:10                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-06 17:24                   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-06 17:45                     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-07  8:58                       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-07  9:41                         ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-07 10:00                           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-07 14:33                             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-07 14:56                               ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-07 15:09                                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-08 10:41                                   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-06 19:50               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-07  3:39                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-07 14:42                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-03  2:27   ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-05-03  6:00     ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2013-04-27  3:13 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: x86: use the fast way to invalid all pages Xiao Guangrong
2013-04-27  3:13 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: MMU: make kvm_mmu_zap_all preemptable Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51835291.20400@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).