From: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
To: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>,
David Goodenough <david.goodenough@btconnect.com>,
debian-arm@lists.debian.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux on small ARM machines <arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk>
Subject: Re: device tree not the answer in the ARM world [was: Re: running Debian on a Cubieboard]
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 12:08:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5187811A.90301@ahsoftware.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPweEDz-Zp91zLG2H_bdj_Z5BSgKaXj6Hc8+OOp1_6Cm01xrFA@mail.gmail.com>
Am 06.05.2013 08:53, schrieb Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton:
> but the question you have to ask is: why should the HW designers even
> care? they're creating an embedded specialist system, they picked the
> most cost-effective and most available solution to them - why _should_
> they care?
>
> and the answer is: they don't have to. tough luck. get over it, mr
> software engineer. hardware cost reductions take priority.
So why do you post this at lkml at all? It looks like your HW is able to
run without SW or if it still needs SW, the necessary SW is freely
available right around the corner, doesn't need modifications and
therefor doesn't need a share of the budget.
Do you develop cables or similiar?
Regards,
Alexander Holler
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-06 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-05 12:27 device tree not the answer in the ARM world [was: Re: running Debian on a Cubieboard] Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2013-05-06 4:09 ` Robert Hancock
2013-05-06 6:53 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2013-05-06 9:04 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2013-05-06 12:08 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2013-05-06 20:01 ` Rob Landley
2013-05-06 20:31 ` Lennart Sorensen
2013-05-06 20:56 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2013-05-07 5:59 ` Kim Enkovaara
2013-05-06 20:55 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2013-05-08 3:44 ` Rob Landley
2013-05-08 8:19 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2013-05-09 0:25 ` Rob Landley
2013-05-06 10:08 ` Alexander Holler [this message]
2013-05-10 0:56 ` Yuhong Bao
2013-05-10 1:00 ` Yuhong Bao
2013-05-06 8:22 ` Oliver Schinagl
2013-05-06 11:47 ` [Arm-netbook] " luke.leighton
[not found] ` <km8de1$mel$1@pye-srv-01.telemetry.co.uk>
2013-05-06 15:25 ` device tree not the answer in the ARM world Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2013-05-08 9:43 ` [Arm-netbook] device tree not the answer in the ARM world [was: Re: running Debian on a Cubieboard] joem
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5187811A.90301@ahsoftware.de \
--to=holler@ahsoftware.de \
--cc=arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk \
--cc=david.goodenough@btconnect.com \
--cc=debian-arm@lists.debian.org \
--cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkcl@lkcl.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox