From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
avi.kivity@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: MMU: fast invalid all shadow pages
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 21:10:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5187ABB3.7020403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130506123625.GB12349@redhat.com>
On 05/06/2013 08:36 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>> Step 1) Fix kvm_mmu_zap_all's behaviour: introduce lockbreak via
>>> spin_needbreak. Use generation numbers so that in case kvm_mmu_zap_all
>>> releases mmu_lock and reacquires it again, only shadow pages
>>> from the generation with which kvm_mmu_zap_all started are zapped (this
>>> guarantees forward progress and eventual termination).
>>>
>>> kvm_mmu_zap_generation()
>>> spin_lock(mmu_lock)
>>> int generation = kvm->arch.mmu_generation;
>>>
>>> for_each_shadow_page(sp) {
>>> if (sp->generation == kvm->arch.mmu_generation)
>>> zap_page(sp)
>>> if (spin_needbreak(mmu_lock)) {
>>> kvm->arch.mmu_generation++;
>>> cond_resched_lock(mmu_lock);
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> kvm_mmu_zap_all()
>>> spin_lock(mmu_lock)
>>> for_each_shadow_page(sp) {
>>> if (spin_needbreak(mmu_lock)) {
>>> cond_resched_lock(mmu_lock);
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> Use kvm_mmu_zap_generation for kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot.
>>> Use kvm_mmu_zap_all for kvm_mmu_notifier_release,kvm_destroy_vm.
>>>
>>> This addresses the main problem: excessively long hold times
>>> of kvm_mmu_zap_all with very large guests.
>>>
>>> Do you see any problem with this logic? This was what i was thinking
>>> we agreed.
>>
>> No. I understand it and it can work.
>>
>> Actually, it is similar with Gleb's idea that "zapping stale shadow pages
>> (and uses lock break technique)", after some discussion, we thought "only zap
>> shadow pages that are reachable from the slot's rmap" is better, that is this
>> patchset does.
>> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/23/73)
>>
> But this is not what the patch is doing. Close, but not the same :)
Okay. :)
> Instead of zapping shadow pages reachable from slot's rmap the patch
> does kvm_unmap_rmapp() which drop all spte without zapping shadow pages.
> That is why you need special code to re-init lpage_info. What I proposed
> was to call zap_page() on all shadow pages reachable from rmap. This
> will take care of lpage_info counters. Does this make sense?
Unfortunately, no! We still need to care lpage_info. lpage_info is used
to count the number of guest page tables in the memslot.
For example, there is a memslot:
memslot[0].based_gfn = 0, memslot[0].npages = 100,
and there is a shadow page:
sp->role.direct =0, sp->role.level = 4, sp->gfn = 10.
this sp is counted in the memslot[0] but it can not be found by walking
memslot[0]->rmap since there is no last mapping in this shadow page.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-06 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-27 3:13 [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: MMU: fast zap all shadow pages Xiao Guangrong
2013-04-27 3:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: MMU: drop unnecessary kvm_reload_remote_mmus Xiao Guangrong
2013-04-27 3:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: x86: introduce memslot_set_lpage_disallowed Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-03 2:10 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-05-03 5:55 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-04-27 3:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: MMU: introduce kvm_clear_all_lpage_info Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-03 2:15 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-05-03 5:57 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-04-27 3:13 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: MMU: fast invalid all shadow pages Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-03 1:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-03 5:52 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-03 15:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-03 16:51 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-04 0:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-04 0:56 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-06 3:39 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-06 12:36 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-06 13:10 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2013-05-06 17:24 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-06 17:45 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-07 8:58 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-07 9:41 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-07 10:00 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-07 14:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-07 14:56 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-07 15:09 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-08 10:41 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-06 19:50 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-07 3:39 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-07 14:42 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-03 2:27 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-05-03 6:00 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-04-27 3:13 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: x86: use the fast way to invalid all pages Xiao Guangrong
2013-04-27 3:13 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: MMU: make kvm_mmu_zap_all preemptable Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5187ABB3.7020403@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).