public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the  tree
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 20:59:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5187FD86.9000005@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130506135109.9c0b24ea1e22784fb28ae6b9@canb.auug.org.au>

Hi,

On 05/06/2013 05:51 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in ipc/sem.c
> between commit 321310ced2d6 ("ipc: move sem_obtain_lock() rcu locking
> into the only caller") from Linus' tree and commit "ipc/sem.c:
> alternatives to preempt_disable()" from the akpm tree.
I would propose that 'ipc/sem.c: alternatives to preempt_disable()' is 
dropped.

As explained in the commit:
That patch is for CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT, it should go into their tree.

--
     Manfred

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-06 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-06  3:51 linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-06 18:59 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-24 13:45 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-24 13:29 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-31  3:50 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-10  8:41 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-27  6:59 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-27 12:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-27 16:52 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-09-27 23:03   ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5187FD86.9000005@colorfullife.com \
    --to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox