public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86, 64bit: Fix a possible wraparound bug in switchover in head_64.S
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 14:48:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5191DE5A.3020302@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)

In head_64.S, a switchover has been used to handle kernel crossing
1G, 512G boundaries.

And commit 8170e6bed465b4b0c7687f93e9948aca4358a33b
    x86, 64bit: Use a #PF handler to materialize early mappings on demand
said:
    During the switchover in head_64.S, before #PF handler is available,
    we use three pages to handle kernel crossing 1G, 512G boundaries with
    sharing page by playing games with page aliasing: the same page is
    mapped twice in the higher-level tables with appropriate wraparound.

But from the switchover code, when we set up the PUD table:
114         addq    $4096, %rdx
115         movq    %rdi, %rax
116         shrq    $PUD_SHIFT, %rax
117         andl    $(PTRS_PER_PUD-1), %eax
118         movq    %rdx, (4096+0)(%rbx,%rax,8)
119         movq    %rdx, (4096+8)(%rbx,%rax,8)

It seems line 119 has a potential bug there. For example,
if the kernel is loaded at physical address 511G+1008M, that is
    000000000 111111111 111111000 000000000000000000000
and the kernel _end is 512G+2M, that is
    000000001 000000000 000000001 000000000000000000000
So in this example, when using the 2nd page to setup PUD (line 114~119),
rax is 511.
In line 118, we put rdx which is the address of the PMD page (the 3rd page)
into entry 511 of the PUD table. But in line 119, the entry we calculate from
(4096+8)(%rbx,%rax,8) has exceeded the PUD page. IMO, the entry in line
119 should be wraparound into entry 0 of the PUD table.

The patch fixes the bug.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
-v2: make the change simpler and avoid using jmp
---
 arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S |    6 ++++--
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
index 08f7e80..321d65e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
@@ -115,8 +115,10 @@ startup_64:
 	movq	%rdi, %rax
 	shrq	$PUD_SHIFT, %rax
 	andl	$(PTRS_PER_PUD-1), %eax
-	movq	%rdx, (4096+0)(%rbx,%rax,8)
-	movq	%rdx, (4096+8)(%rbx,%rax,8)
+	movq	%rdx, 4096(%rbx,%rax,8)
+	incl	%eax
+	andl	$(PTRS_PER_PUD-1), %eax
+	movq	%rdx, 4096(%rbx,%rax,8)
 
 	addq	$8192, %rbx
 	movq	%rdi, %rax
-- 
1.7.1

             reply	other threads:[~2013-05-14  6:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-14  6:48 Zhang Yanfei [this message]
2013-05-28 23:02 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86-64, init: Fix a possible wraparound bug in switchover in head_64.S tip-bot for Zhang Yanfei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5191DE5A.3020302@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox