From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754468Ab3ENQPl (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 May 2013 12:15:41 -0400 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:47273 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751103Ab3ENQPj (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 May 2013 12:15:39 -0400 Message-ID: <51926325.2050805@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 10:15:33 -0600 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Viresh Kumar CC: rjw@sisk.pl, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com, arvind.chauhan@arm.com, Sekhar Nori , Ben Dooks , Kukjin Kim , Simon Horman , Magnus Damm , Ralf Baechle , Arnd Bergmann , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Olof Johansson , Srinidhi Kasagar , Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 resend] cpufreq: Raname index as data in cpufreq_frequency_table References: <7e12acada8adcba5f4eb72f6c49e38aaf00a294f.1368434974.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <5191148E.7050205@wwwdotorg.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/14/2013 07:46 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: ... > This must address your concerns: > @Rafael: I have attached both patches now for you to apply. > > From: Viresh Kumar > Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 19:08:50 +0530 > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: tegra: Remove irrelevant comment > > Tegra cpufreq driver doesn't use .index field of cpufreq_frequency_table and so > comment mentioning order of .index is irrelevant. Remove it. > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c > -/* Frequency table index must be sequential starting at 0 */ > static struct cpufreq_frequency_table freq_table[] = { > { 0, 216000 }, > { 1, 312000 }, Does the .index/.data field even need to be filled in any more?