linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/xen: sync the CMOS RTC as well as the Xen wallclock
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 19:00:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51927BBF.5010404@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51927339.5070402@linaro.org>

On 14/05/13 18:24, John Stultz wrote:
> On 05/13/2013 10:56 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
>> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>>
>> If NTP is used in dom0 and it is synchronized to its clock source,
>> then the kernel will periodically synchronize the Xen wallclock with
>> the system time.  Updates to the Xen wallclock do not persist across
>> reboots, so also synchronize the CMOS RTC (as on bare metal).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/xen/time.c |   11 ++++++++++-
>>   1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/time.c b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
>> index a1947ac..4656165 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
>>   #include <linux/math64.h>
>>   #include <linux/gfp.h>
>> +#include <linux/mc146818rtc.h>
>>   
>>   #include <asm/pvclock.h>
>>   #include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h>
>> @@ -199,17 +200,25 @@ static void xen_get_wallclock(struct timespec *now)
>>   static int xen_set_wallclock(const struct timespec *now)
>>   {
>>   	struct xen_platform_op op;
>> +	int ret;
>>   
>>   	/* do nothing for domU */
>>   	if (!xen_initial_domain())
>>   		return -1;
>>   
>> +	/* Set the Xen wallclock. */
>>   	op.cmd = XENPF_settime;
>>   	op.u.settime.secs = now->tv_sec;
>>   	op.u.settime.nsecs = now->tv_nsec;
>>   	op.u.settime.system_time = xen_clocksource_read();
>>   
>> -	return HYPERVISOR_dom0_op(&op);
>> +	ret = HYPERVISOR_dom0_op(&op);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	/* Set the hardware RTC. */
>> +	return mach_set_rtc_mmss(now);
> 
> Sorry, just noticed one more thing while applying this. Do all Xen 
> systems run on hardware that has the conventional CMOS clock?
> 
> What happens if the bare-metal needs to use efi_set_rtc() or 
> vrtc_set_mmss() ?

Ug. I hadn't considered that.  I'll have think some more on this.

David

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-14 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-13 17:56 [PATCH 0/3] x86,time,xen: maintain an accurate persistent clock in more cases David Vrabel
2013-05-13 17:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: increase precision of x86_platform.get/set_wallclock() David Vrabel
2013-05-14  0:57   ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 17:52   ` John Stultz
2013-05-29  0:18   ` John Stultz
2013-05-29 12:16     ` David Vrabel
2013-05-13 17:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] timekeeping: sync persistent clock and RTC on system time step changes David Vrabel
2013-05-14  0:40   ` John Stultz
2013-05-14  9:47     ` David Vrabel
2013-05-14 17:15       ` John Stultz
2013-05-15  8:16         ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2013-05-15 18:10           ` John Stultz
2013-05-28 18:26             ` David Vrabel
2013-05-28 18:31               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-28 19:09                 ` John Stultz
2013-05-28 19:48                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-28 20:03                     ` John Stultz
2013-05-28 20:11                       ` John Stultz
2013-05-28 20:25                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-28 20:30                           ` John Stultz
2013-05-28 19:06               ` John Stultz
2013-05-13 17:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/xen: sync the CMOS RTC as well as the Xen wallclock David Vrabel
2013-05-14  0:52   ` John Stultz
2013-05-14  7:57     ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2013-05-14 15:59       ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 16:14         ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-14 16:17           ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 16:24             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-14 16:28               ` John Stultz
2013-05-14  9:55     ` David Vrabel
2013-05-14 17:24   ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 18:00     ` David Vrabel [this message]
2013-05-14 18:03       ` John Stultz
2013-05-15  8:19     ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2013-05-15 18:13       ` John Stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51927BBF.5010404@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).