From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/workqueue.c: need call device_remove_file() when failure occurs after called device_create_file()
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 12:16:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51945D90.8010600@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51945384.9060308@asianux.com>
On 05/16/2013 11:33 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 05/16/2013 05:22 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 02:13:14PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>
>>> In workqueue_sysfs_register(), when failure occurs after called
>>> device_create_file(), need call device_remove_file() to release the
>>> related resources, then call device_unregister().
>>>
>>> Or it will cause issue.
>>>
>>> For individual 'device_attributs' (just like our case), need call
>>> device_remove_file() explictly and then call device_unregister(),
>>> please reference drivers/base/*.c (e.g node.c or cpu.c).
>>
>> Hmm... isn't this already taken care of by __sysfs_remove_dir() which
>> device_unregister() calls? That function removes all non-directory
>> files under the directory being removed.
>>
>
> It just like what you said:
> device_unregister() ->
> kobject_del() ->
> sysfs_remove_dir() ->
> __sysfs_remove_dir() ->
> sysfs_remove_one()
> But:
> device_remove_file() ->
> sysfs_remove_file() ->
> ...
> sysfs_attr_ns() ->
> ops->namespace() (such as device_namespace() in workqueue.c)
> ...
> sysfs_hash_and_remove() ->
> sysfs_remove_one().
>
> So if not call device_remove_file() explicitly, the device_namespace()
> may be not called.
>
It seems, if not call ops->namespace(), it still is OK. To get a result,
it still has much details to continue to read.
But all together, reference the related code of another subsystems, we
really need device_remove_file() before call device_unregister().
>
> Even in device_unregister(), it still call device_remove_file() to
> release the related attributes firstly, then call kobject_del().
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
--
Chen Gang
Asianux Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-16 4:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-14 12:25 [PATCH] kernel/workqueue.c: better to free related resources when failure occurs in wq_numa_init() Chen Gang
2013-05-14 15:17 ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-15 2:16 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-15 6:13 ` [PATCH] kernel/workqueue.c: need call device_remove_file() when failure occurs after called device_create_file() Chen Gang
2013-05-15 21:22 ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-16 3:33 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-16 4:16 ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-05-16 4:48 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-16 17:50 ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-17 2:51 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51945D90.8010600@asianux.com \
--to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox