public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] perf report: Add report.percent-limit config variable
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 10:34:51 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51948C1B.20408@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8761yk5zdr.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>

On 05/15/2013 01:08 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Pekka,
>
> On Tue, 14 May 2013 14:05:38 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
>>> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
>>>
>>> Now an user can set a default value of --percent-limit option into the
>>> perfconfig file.
>>>
>>>    $ cat ~/.perfconfig
>>>    [report]
>>>    percent-limit = 0.1
>>>
>>> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
>>> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>>
>> I'm not totally convinced this is useful. The limit is about "what is
>> significant" and that depends on what you are trying to measure.
>> There's an (absolute) lower limit somewhere between 0.1 and 1.0 but I
>> think we can just pick a reasonable default and  let people use the
>> command line switch if they want to override it.
>
> If the limit depends on what is measured, what should be the reasonable
> default value?  I just don't know..
>
> I agree that we should pick a default but the config variable doesn't
> harm anything in this case too.  Some users might not agree with our
> default for their cases and want to use other value.
>
> But I'm not insist on it so strongly, I just gave another way.. ;)

I'd go for default value of 1.0 first and if people complain, drop it to 
0.1. But I guess it's safer to add your config option thingy just in case:

Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>

			Pekka

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-16  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-14  2:08 [PATCHSET 0/9] perf tools: Assorted fixes and changes on perf top/report Namhyung Kim
2013-05-14  2:08 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf top: Fix -E option behavior Namhyung Kim
2013-05-17 14:21   ` Jiri Olsa
2013-05-31 11:34   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2013-05-14  2:09 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf top: Fix percent output when no samples collected Namhyung Kim
2013-05-17 14:22   ` Jiri Olsa
2013-05-31 11:35   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2013-05-14  2:09 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf top: Get rid of *_threaded() functions Namhyung Kim
2013-05-17 14:28   ` Jiri Olsa
2013-05-31 11:37   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2013-05-14  2:09 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf hists: Move locking to its call-sites Namhyung Kim
2013-05-17 14:39   ` Jiri Olsa
2013-05-31 11:38   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2013-05-14  2:09 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf report: Don't be bothered with locking when adding hist entries Namhyung Kim
2013-05-17 14:39   ` Jiri Olsa
2013-05-31 11:39   ` [tip:perf/core] perf report: Don' t bother " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2013-05-14  2:09 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf report: Add --percent-limit option Namhyung Kim
2013-05-31 11:40   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2013-05-14  2:09 ` [PATCH 7/9] perf top: " Namhyung Kim
2013-05-31 11:42   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2013-05-14  2:09 ` [PATCH 8/9] perf report: Add report.percent-limit config variable Namhyung Kim
2013-05-14 11:05   ` Pekka Enberg
2013-05-15 10:08     ` Namhyung Kim
2013-05-16  7:34       ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2013-05-31 11:43   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2013-05-14  2:09 ` [PATCH 9/9] perf top: Reuse " Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51948C1B.20408@kernel.org \
    --to=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox