public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Documentation: allow multiple return statements per function
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 10:52:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5194F2B7.6080204@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130515172021.GA304@elgon.mountain>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1087 bytes --]

On 15-05-2013 13:20, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> A surprising number of newbies interpret this section to mean that only
> one return statement is allowed per function.  Part of the problem is
> that the "one return statement per function" rule is an actual style
> guideline that people are used to from other projects.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/CodingStyle b/Documentation/CodingStyle
> index e00b8f0..7fe0546 100644
> --- a/Documentation/CodingStyle
> +++ b/Documentation/CodingStyle
> @@ -389,7 +389,8 @@ Albeit deprecated by some people, the equivalent of the goto statement is
>  used frequently by compilers in form of the unconditional jump instruction.
>  
>  The goto statement comes in handy when a function exits from multiple
> -locations and some common work such as cleanup has to be done.
> +locations and some common work such as cleanup has to be done.  If there is no
> +cleanup needed then just return directly.

Agreed with this rephrasing.

>  
>  The rationale is:
>  
> 



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 295 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-05-16 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-15 17:20 [patch] Documentation: allow multiple return statements per function Dan Carpenter
2013-05-15 23:00 ` Rob Landley
2013-05-16 14:52 ` Eduardo Valentin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5194F2B7.6080204@ti.com \
    --to=eduardo.valentin@ti.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox