From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754452Ab3EUHoc (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 May 2013 03:44:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45741 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751574Ab3EUHoa (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 May 2013 03:44:30 -0400 Message-ID: <519B25CD.5060801@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 09:44:13 +0200 From: Daniel Borkmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Rothwell CC: Andrew Morton , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Schichan Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree References: <20130521142537.00a9ccb7ca4aa81f553b61cf@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20130521142537.00a9ccb7ca4aa81f553b61cf@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Stephen, On 05/21/2013 06:25 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in > arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c between commit aafc787e41fd ("arm: bpf_jit: can > call module_free() from any context") from the net-next tree and commit > "ARM: net: bpf_jit: make code generation less dependent on struct > sk_filter" from the akpm tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). Also seccomp_jit_free() needs a change otherwise the kernel won't build with CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER_JIT enabled since the work_struct is initialized with the bpf_jit_free_worker() callback, which is no longer existent. Do you want me to send you a patch? Quite frankly, I don't like so much that {seccomp,bpf}_jit_compile() and {seccomp,bpf}_jit_free() are almost idential functions and now both need to be maintained with the same changes, but that's off-topic here. Cheers, Daniel