From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, nschichan@freebox.fr
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 09:48:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <519C785B.6070104@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130522.001909.837849096281513655.davem@davemloft.net>
On 05/22/2013 09:19 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 00:14:58 -0700
>
>> On Wed, 22 May 2013 00:07:48 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 13:04:38 -0700
>>>
>>>> Nicolas, I think the patches need a re-check so I'll drop the versions
>>>> which I presently have. Please refresh, retest and resend when
>>>> convenient? It'll need to be against linux-next, which is where the
>>>> conflicting (vfree/module_free) changes have occurred.
>>>
>>> How about working against net-next and submitting your patches to netdev
>>> just like the rest of the world?
>>
>> Well that's probably practical. But the patchset is a seccomp
>> enhancement for (at present) ARM. Not exactly net stuff, or anything
>> which netdev readers are likely to spend a lot of time testing and
>> reviewing.
>
> The seccomp BPF bits we reviewed and were interested in completely, because
> we're going to have to support JIT'ing all of that stuff on every cpu and
> we're interested how it fits into the existing BPF codes and infrastructure.
+1
seccomp is wired with BPF (JITs in arch/*/net/ + net/core/filter.c) and that's
part of networking, so they should go through netdev. This makes it also way
easier for review.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-22 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-21 4:29 linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21 20:04 ` Andrew Morton
2013-05-22 7:07 ` David Miller
2013-05-22 7:14 ` Andrew Morton
2013-05-22 7:19 ` David Miller
2013-05-22 7:48 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-06-02 9:30 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-02 9:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-03 10:49 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-16 4:51 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-20 5:10 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-07 5:23 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-07 8:40 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2017-02-07 9:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-14 7:39 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-14 7:38 Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-23 8:18 Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-06 9:00 Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-06 8:55 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21 4:32 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21 4:25 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21 7:44 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-05-21 23:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-22 9:20 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-05-20 4:14 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-20 4:11 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-20 6:02 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-20 6:43 ` Cong Wang
2013-02-15 6:56 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-08 3:56 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-23 3:27 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-23 3:40 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=519C785B.6070104@redhat.com \
--to=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nschichan@freebox.fr \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox