public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/sched/core.c: need return NULL when BUG() is defined as empty.
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 17:29:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <519C900F.1040008@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130522091156.GC18810@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 05/22/2013 05:11 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 03:48:53PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> > 
>> > When neither CONFIG_BUG nor HAVE_ARCH_BUG is defined, need let function
>> > return failure value ('NULL') instead of random value.
> What will such a kernel do? Happily continue running whenever we hit a
> BUG? that seems like a particularly bad idea. Should we not have a stub
> BUG() function like:
> 
> void BUG(void) __attribute__((noreturn))
> {
> 	local_irq_disable();
> 	while (1) ;
> }
> 
> Which would at least halt things?
> 
> 

At least for me, it is a good idea. :-)

In menuconfig we can set !CONFIG_BUG and !HAVE_ARCH_BUG manually under
any architectures:

  "> General setup > Configure standard kernel features (expert users) > BUG() Support"

So I think, we really need your patch.


Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang

Asianux Corporation

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-22  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-20  7:48 [PATCH] kernel/sched/core.c: need return NULL when BUG() is defined as empty Chen Gang
2013-05-22  9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-22  9:29   ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-05-22 13:33   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-22 16:19     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-23  1:00       ` Chen Gang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=519C900F.1040008@asianux.com \
    --to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox