From: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
To: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Vahram Martirosyan <vmartirosyan@gmail.com>,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@kernel.org>,
Vahram Martirosyan <vahram.martirosyan@linuxtesting.org>,
jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spruce-project@linuxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] jfs: Log shutdown error in jfs_freeze() function
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 15:32:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <519FCE6A.9020701@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <519F3212.6050602@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 05/24/2013 04:25 AM, Gu Zheng wrote:
> Hi Vahram,
> I saw the same issue in the bugzilla:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53331,
> and I sent out a patch this issue, but I've get any feedback.
Sorry I missed that bug. I just realized that bugzilla.kernel.org has
been sending my email to my old IBM address. I've got some catching up
to do.
> In fact, I think it's the right way to fix this issue,
> can you help to test it?
I might go with your patch for now, as it is an improvement, but I don't
really like the way that lmLogShutdown is skipped altogether during a
"nointegrity" unmount. If we skip it during a "nointegrity" freeze, we
should also skip lmLogInit on "nointegrity" unfreeze. I'd like to keep
the nointegrity logic in jfs_logmgr.c, but it would be easiest to fix in
the freeze and unfreeze functions. A code cleanup may be better than the
easy fix. I'll have to work on that.
It also looks like freeze/unfreeze doesn't take into account that two or
more mounted file systems can share the same journal. I don't know how
often, if ever, this is done in practice, but it looks like it would be
a problem. Two "nointegrity" mounts may have problem too. That should be
easy enough to verify.
Thanks,
Shaggy
>
> Thanks,
> Gu
>
>
> On 05/24/2013 04:57 PM, Vahram Martirosyan wrote:
>
>> In function jfs_freeze() the log is shut down through lmLogShutdown() call.
>> When the "nointegrity" mount option is enabled, the log is actually not
>> initialized. As a result the freeze operation in that case brings to a
>> kernel OOPS.
>>
>> The solution is to check if the "nointegrity" option is enabled and if it is not
>> then shut the log down.
>>
>> May be this is not the best solution, but at least it fixes the OOPS.
>>
>> Found by Linux File System Verification project (linuxtesting.org)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vahram Martirosyan <vahram.martirosyan@linuxtesting.org>
>> ---
>> fs/jfs/super.c | 10 ++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/jfs/super.c b/fs/jfs/super.c
>> index a3d424d..9788970 100644
>> --- a/fs/jfs/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/jfs/super.c
>> @@ -615,10 +615,12 @@ static int jfs_freeze(struct super_block *sb)
>>
>> if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
>> txQuiesce(sb);
>> - rc = lmLogShutdown(log);
>> - if (rc != 0) {
>> - jfs_err("lmLogShutdown failed with return code %d", rc);
>> - return rc;
>> + if (!log->no_integrity) {
>> + rc = lmLogShutdown(log);
>> + if (rc != 0) {
>> + jfs_err("lmLogShutdown failed with return code %d", rc);
>> + return rc;
>> + }
>> }
>> rc = updateSuper(sb, FM_CLEAN);
>> if (rc != 0) {
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-24 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-24 8:57 [PATCH 1/2] jfs: Several bugs in jfs_freeze() and jfs_unfreeze() Vahram Martirosyan
2013-05-24 8:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] jfs: Log shutdown error in jfs_freeze() function Vahram Martirosyan
2013-05-24 9:25 ` Gu Zheng
2013-05-24 20:32 ` Dave Kleikamp [this message]
2013-05-24 17:03 ` [Jfs-discussion] [PATCH 1/2] jfs: Several bugs in jfs_freeze() and jfs_unfreeze() Dave Kleikamp
2013-05-24 21:01 ` [PATCH] " Dave Kleikamp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=519FCE6A.9020701@oracle.com \
--to=dave.kleikamp@oracle.com \
--cc=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaggy@kernel.org \
--cc=spruce-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=vahram.martirosyan@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=vmartirosyan@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox