From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752828Ab3EaBQn (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 May 2013 21:16:43 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.64]:5017 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752771Ab3EaBQc (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 May 2013 21:16:32 -0400 Message-ID: <51A7F9C7.3080404@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 09:15:51 +0800 From: Kefeng Wang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Bottomley CC: "David S. Miller" , Thomas Bogendoerfer , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] scsi: use platform helper macro and wrapper functions References: <1369915786-2660-1-git-send-email-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> <1369924699.1972.4.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> In-Reply-To: <1369924699.1972.4.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.135.68.221] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2013-05-30 22:38, James Bottomley wrote: > There doesn't seem to be much point to these patches since either idiom > is fine and easily understood. We also try to touch the ancient drivers > as little as possible since it can be months before anyone actually > tries them out and notices that something got broken, so the rule for > them is obvious bug fixes only. > > James hi James, Thanks for remind, I got it.